Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Feb 10:1:10.
doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-10.

Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach

Sara Khangura  1 , Kristin Konnyu, Rob Cushman, Jeremy Grimshaw, David Moher
Affiliations

Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach

Sara Khangura et al. Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Rapid reviews have emerged as a streamlined approach to synthesizing evidence - typically for informing emergent decisions faced by decision makers in health care settings. Although there is growing use of rapid review 'methods', and proliferation of rapid review products, there is a dearth of published literature on rapid review methodology. This paper outlines our experience with rapidly producing, publishing and disseminating evidence summaries in the context of our Knowledge to Action (KTA) research program.

Methods: The KTA research program is a two-year project designed to develop and assess the impact of a regional knowledge infrastructure that supports evidence-informed decision making by regional managers and stakeholders. As part of this program, we have developed evidence summaries - our form of rapid review - which have come to be a flagship component of this project. Our eight-step approach for producing evidence summaries has been developed iteratively, based on evidence (where available), experience and knowledge user feedback. The aim of our evidence summary approach is to deliver quality evidence that is both timely and user-friendly.

Results: From November 2009 to March 2011 we have produced 11 evidence summaries on a diverse range of questions identified by our knowledge users. Topic areas have included questions of clinical effectiveness to questions on health systems and/or health services. Knowledge users have reported evidence summaries to be of high value in informing their decisions and initiatives. We continue to experiment with incorporating more of the established methods of systematic reviews, while maintaining our capacity to deliver a final product in a timely manner.

Conclusions: The evolution of the KTA rapid review evidence summaries has been a positive one. We have developed an approach that appears to be addressing a need by knowledge users for timely, user-friendly, and trustworthy evidence and have transparently reported these methods here for the wider rapid review and scientific community.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Short stay unit evidence summary (excerpt).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Green S, Higgins J, Alderson P, Clarke M, Mulrow C, Oxman A. In: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Higgins J, Green S, editor. West Sussex, England: The Cochrane Collaboration and John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2008. Chapter 1 - Introduction.
    1. Hailey D, Corabian P, Harstall C, Schneider W. The use and impact of rapid health technology assessments. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16:651–656. - PubMed
    1. Ganann R, Ciliska D, Thomas H. Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews. Implement Sci. 2010;5:56. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-56. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Watt A, Cameron A, Sturm L, Lathlean T, Babidge W, Blamey S. et al.Rapid versus full systematic reviews: validity in clinical practice? ANZ J Surg. 2008;78:1037–1040. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04730.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McGregor M, Brophy JM. End-user involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) development: a way to increase impact. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21:263–267. - PubMed

Publication types