Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Feb 10:1:11.
doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-11.

Methods for the evaluation of hospital cooperation activities (Systematic review protocol)

Thomas Rotter  1 , Daniela Popa, Beatrice Riley, Tim Ellermann, Ulrike Ryll, Genc Burazeri, Piet Daemen, Guy Peeters, Helmut Brand
Affiliations

Methods for the evaluation of hospital cooperation activities (Systematic review protocol)

Thomas Rotter et al. Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Hospital partnerships, mergers and cooperatives are arrangements frequently seen as a means of improving health service delivery. Many of the assumptions used in planning hospital cooperatives are not stated clearly and are often based on limited or poor scientific evidence.

Methods: This is a protocol for a systematic review, following the Cochrane EPOC methodology. The review aims to document, catalogue and synthesize the existing literature on the reported methods for the evaluation of hospital cooperation activities as well as methods of hospital cooperation. We will search the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness, the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and bibliographic databases including PubMed (via NLM), Web of Science, NHS EED, Business Source Premier (via EBSCO) and Global Health for publications that report on methods for evaluating hospital cooperatives, strategic partnerships, mergers, alliances, networks and related activities and methods used for such partnerships. The method proposed by the Cochrane EPOC group regarding randomized study designs, controlled clinical trials, controlled before and after studies, and interrupted time series will be followed. In addition, we will also include cohort, case-control studies, and relevant non-comparative publications such as case reports. We will categorize and analyze the review findings according to the study design employed, the study quality (low versus high quality studies) and the method reported in the primary studies. We will present the results of studies in tabular form.

Discussion: Overall, the systematic review aims to identify, assess and synthesize the evidence to underpin hospital cooperation activities as defined in this protocol. As a result, the review will provide an evidence base for partnerships, alliances or other fields of cooperation in a hospital setting. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42011001579.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Edwards N, Harrison A. The hospital of the future-Planning hospitals with limited evidence: a research and policy problem. British Medical Journal. 1999;319(7221):1361–1363. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7221.1361. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Haycock J, Stanley A, Edwards N, Nicholls R. The hospital of the future-Changing hospitals. British Medical Journal. 1999;319(7219):1262–1264. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7219.1262. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McKee M, Healy J, editor. Hospitals in a changing Europe. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2002.
    1. OECD-Health-Data. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) Paris: OECD Publishing; 2008.
    1. ECOMA. Evaluation of the cooperation of two University Hospitals in a European crossborder setting. Maastricht University; http://www.ecoma-online.eu (accessed 10-06-2011)

Publication types