Contrast sensitivity as a function of focus in patients with the diffractive multifocal intraocular lens
- PMID: 2258804
- DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(13)81009-7
Contrast sensitivity as a function of focus in patients with the diffractive multifocal intraocular lens
Abstract
Contrast sensitivity as a function of focus and visual acuity as a function of contrast were investigated in 19 patients with a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens and compared with 19 control patients with a conventional monofocal implant. The contrast sensitivity of the multifocal patients followed a bimodal curve with a maximum sensitivity at the far focus and a second peak at the near focus, corresponding to about +3 diopters in the spectacle plane. The maximum sensitivity of the multifocal group was 0.14 log units lower than the control group (P less than .05). In the near region, the contrast sensitivity of the multifocal patients exceeded that of the control group from +2 diopters and inward. No difference in distance visual acuity was found with high contrast letters. With intermediate contrast letters, the visual acuity of the multifocal patients was lower than that of the control group (P less than .05).
Similar articles
-
One-year outcomes with new-generation multifocal intraocular lenses.Ophthalmology. 2008 Sep;115(9):1508-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.04.017. Epub 2008 Jun 5. Ophthalmology. 2008. PMID: 18538402 Clinical Trial.
-
A prospective, randomized, double-masked comparison of a zonal-progressive multifocal intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lens.Ophthalmology. 1992 Jun;99(6):853-60; discussion 860-1. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(92)31864-0. Ophthalmology. 1992. PMID: 1630773 Clinical Trial.
-
Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity: AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive versus AcrySof SA60AT monofocal intraocular lenses.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Jul;33(7):1244-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.03.052. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007. PMID: 17586381
-
[Multifocal intraocular lenses].Klin Oczna. 2006;108(4-6):247-52. Klin Oczna. 2006. PMID: 17020006 Review. Polish.
-
[Multifocal intraocular lenses--an assessment of current status].Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1993 Jul;203(1):19-33. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1045645. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1993. PMID: 8411889 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Effect of Fasting on Contrast Sensitivity in Healthy Males.J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2019 Jul 18;14(3):315-320. doi: 10.18502/jovr.v14i3.4789. eCollection 2019 Jul-Sep. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2019. PMID: 31660111 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Bilateral implantation of multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lens in children above 5 years of age.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014 Mar;252(3):441-7. doi: 10.1007/s00417-014-2571-0. Epub 2014 Jan 19. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014. PMID: 24441952 Clinical Trial.
-
Halo size under distance and near conditions in refractive multifocal intraocular lenses.Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 Jul;85(7):816-21. doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.7.816. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001. PMID: 11423456 Free PMC article.
-
Tritan colour contrast sensitivity function in refractive multifocal intraocular lenses.Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 Jul;85(7):811-5. doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.7.811. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001. PMID: 11423455 Free PMC article.
-
Bifocal intraocular lenses.Br J Ophthalmol. 1991 Jun;75(6):367. doi: 10.1136/bjo.75.6.367. Br J Ophthalmol. 1991. PMID: 2043582 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources