Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1990 Aug;4(4):350-2.

A screening programme for hypertension in general practice

Affiliations
  • PMID: 2258871
Clinical Trial

A screening programme for hypertension in general practice

F R Taylor et al. J Hum Hypertens. 1990 Aug.

Abstract

It is recommended that hypertensive patients with a diastolic blood pressure of 100 mmHg be treated. However, it has been proposed that only 50% of hypertensives are diagnosed, and of these, 50% are not treated. We therefore set out to identify hypertensive patients in our practice, who were then actively treated, some in a clinical trial of ketanserin. Of the 3,384 patients (1,667 males and 2,707 females) who were invited to our surgery for a blood pressure measurement, 2,606 patients (77%) attended. The overall prevalence of hypertension in the patients, aged 35-65 years was 2.9%. This prevalence increased with age: from 1.0% in the 35-44 year age group to 3.5% at 45-54 years, and 4.4% at 55-64 years. The mean systolic but not diastolic blood pressure increased with age. There were more male hypertensives than females, except over 55 years of age. Of the 84 hypertensives identified after one visit, the majority remained hypertensive after an additional visit, and 31 agreed to participate in a clinical trial. After a four-week placebo run-in, 22 patients had a diastolic blood pressure above 95 mmHg and were randomly allocated to receive ketanserin 40 mg twice daily or metoprolol 100 mg twice daily. Treatment continued double-blind for three months. There were no significant differences in blood pressure reduction between the treatment groups. The heart rate was reduced more by metoprolol. There were no withdrawals for side effects and no major differences in subjective complaints between the two treatment groups.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources