Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2012 Jul;188(1):130-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.2569. Epub 2012 May 15.

Treatment of ureteral and renal stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials

Brian R Matlaga  1 , Jeroen P Jansen, Lisa M Meckley, Thomas W Byrne, James E Lingeman
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Treatment of ureteral and renal stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials

Brian R Matlaga et al. J Urol. 2012 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: We compared the clinical outcomes of patients with ureteral or renal stones treated with ureteroscopy, shock wave lithotripsy using HM3 (Dornier®) and nonHM3 lithotripters, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Materials and methods: A systematic literature search identified 6, 4 and 3 randomized, controlled trials of treatment of distal and proximal ureteral stones, and renal stones, respectively, published between 1995 and 2010. Overall stone-free, re-treatment and complication rates were calculated by meta-analytical techniques.

Results: Based on the randomized, controlled trials evaluated the treatment of distal ureteral stones with semirigid ureteroscopy showed a 55% greater probability (pooled RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.13-2.56) of stone-free status at the initial assessment than treatment with shock wave lithotripsy. Patients treated with semirigid ureteroscopy were also less likely to require re-treatment than those treated with shock wave lithotripsy (nonHM3) (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.08-0.23). The risk of complications was no different between the 2 modalities. Only 2 of the 4 randomized, controlled trials identified for proximal ureteral stones evaluated flexible ureteroscopy and each focused specifically on the treatment of stones 1.5 cm or greater, limiting their clinical relevance. The degree of heterogeneity among the studies evaluating renal stones was so great that it precluded any meaningful comparison.

Conclusions: Semirigid ureteroscopy is more efficacious than shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteral stones. To our knowledge there are no relevant randomized, controlled trials of flexible ureteroscopy treatment of proximal ureteral calculi of a size commonly noted in the clinical setting. Collectively the comparative effectiveness of ureteroscopy and shock wave lithotripsy for proximal ureteral and renal calculi is poorly characterized with no meaningful published studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
RCT network for distal (A) and proximal (B) ureteral stones
Figure 2
Figure 2
Meta-analysis of distal ureteral SFR at first available evaluation
Figure 3
Figure 3
Meta-analysis of SR-URS vs SWL-other SFR and distal ureteral stones at all time points.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Indirect comparison of proximal ureteral SFR at first available evaluation
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Stamatelou KK, Francis ME, Jones CA, et al. Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976–1994. Kidney Int. 2003;63:1817. - PubMed
    1. Pearle MS, Calhoun EA, Curhan GC. Urologic Diseases in America project: urolithiasis. J Urol. 2005;173:848. - PubMed
    1. Matlaga BR. Contemporary surgical management of upper urinary tract calculi. 2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol. 2009;1181:2152. - PubMed
    1. Nabi G, Downey P, Keeley F, et al. Extra-corporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007:CD006029. - PubMed
    1. Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, et al. Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. Eur Urol. 2007;2007;52:1610. - PubMed

Publication types