Utility of MRI in spinal arteriovenous fistula
- PMID: 22592367
- DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182582f07
Utility of MRI in spinal arteriovenous fistula
Abstract
Objective and background: Spinal arteriovenous fistula (SAVF) is a rare but treatable cause of myelopathy. The diagnostic accuracy of MRI for detecting SAVF is unknown. Our objective was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of MRI in the diagnosis SAVF and characterize its radiographic features.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective case-control study of all SAVF treated at our institution from 1995 to 2010, including patients who presented with myelopathy, had MRIs available for review, and underwent either spinal angiogram or had another diagnosis confirming test. Two blinded board-certified radiologists reviewed a series of MRIs and listed the most likely diagnoses, radiologic findings, and recommended follow-up. Sensitivities and specificities of MRI compared to spinal angiogram were calculated. We additionally conducted a literature review of cases describing MRI findings in spinal dural and perimedullary arteriovenous fistula.
Results: We identified 36 cases of SAVF (median age 56, 67% male) and 32 controls (median age 54, 44% male). MRI was sensitive in identifying SAVF as the primary diagnosis in 94% (radiologist A, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-1.02) and 89% (radiologist B, 95% CI 0.79-0.99) of cases. The sensitivity of spinal cord T2 hyperintensity or flow voids was 100% and the specificity of T2 hyperintensity and flow voids was 97%.
Conclusions: Among patients with myelopathy, spinal angiography is mandatory in the presence of both T2 hyperintensity and flow voids but may be unnecessary if both of these findings are absent.
Comment in
-
Can we rule out a spinal arteriovenous fistula using only MRI? Yes, we can.Neurology. 2012 Jul 3;79(1):15-6. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182582f1f. Epub 2012 May 16. Neurology. 2012. PMID: 22592375 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical