Antiarrhythmics for maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation
- PMID: 22592700
- DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005049.pub3
Antiarrhythmics for maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation
Update in
-
Antiarrhythmics for maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 28;(3):CD005049. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005049.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 04;9:CD005049. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005049.pub5. PMID: 25820938 Updated.
Abstract
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent sustained arrhythmia. AF recurs frequently after restoration of normal sinus rhythm. Antiarrhythmic drugs have been widely used to prevent recurrence, but the effect of these drugs on mortality and other clinical outcomes is unclear.
Objectives: To determine, in patients who recovered sinus rhythm after AF, the effect of long-term treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs on death, stroke and embolism, adverse effects, pro-arrhythmia, and recurrence of AF.
Search methods: We updated the searches of CENTRAL on The Cochrane Libary (Issue 1 of 4, 2010), MEDLINE (1950 to February 2010) and EMBASE (1966 to February 2010). The reference lists of retrieved articles, recent reviews and meta-analyses were checked.
Selection criteria: Two independent reviewers selected randomised controlled trials comparing any antiarrhythmic with a control (no treatment, placebo or drugs for rate control) or with another antiarrhythmic, in adults who had AF and in whom sinus rhythm was restored. Post-operative AF was excluded.
Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers independently assessed quality and extracted data. Studies were pooled, if appropriate, using Peto odds ratio (OR). All results were calculated at one year of follow-up.
Main results: In this update, 11 new studies met inclusion criteria, making a total of 56 included studies, comprising 20,771 patients. Compared with controls, class IA drugs quinidine and disopyramide (OR 2.39, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 1.03 to 5.59, number needed to harm (NNH) 109, 95%CI 34 to 4985) and sotalol (OR 2.47, 95%CI 1.2 to 5.05, NNH 166, 95%CI 61 to 1159) were associated with increased all-cause mortality. Other antiarrhythmics did not seem to modify mortality.Several class IA (disopyramide, quinidine), IC (flecainide, propafenone) and III (amiodarone, dofetilide, dronedarone, sotalol) drugs significantly reduced recurrence of AF (OR 0.19 to 0.70, number needed to treat (NNT) 3 to 16). Beta-blockers (metoprolol) also reduced significantly AF recurrence (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.88, NNT 9).All analysed drugs increased withdrawals due to adverse affects and all but amiodarone, dronedarone and propafenone increased pro-arrhythmia. We could not analyse other outcomes because few original studies reported them.
Authors' conclusions: Several class IA, IC and III drugs, as well as class II (beta-blockers), are moderately effective in maintaining sinus rhythm after conversion of atrial fibrillation. However, they increase adverse events, including pro-arrhythmia, and some of them (disopyramide, quinidine and sotalol) may increase mortality. Possible benefits on clinically relevant outcomes (stroke, embolisms, heart failure) remain to be established.
Update of
-
Antiarrhythmics for maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;(4):CD005049. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005049.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16;(5):CD005049. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005049.pub3. PMID: 17943835 Updated.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
