Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Oct;57(5):757-68.
doi: 10.1007/s00038-012-0369-6. Epub 2012 May 17.

Air pollution interventions and their impact on public health

Affiliations
Review

Air pollution interventions and their impact on public health

Susann Henschel et al. Int J Public Health. 2012 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: Numerous epidemiological studies have found a link between air pollution and health. We are reviewing a collection of published intervention studies with particular focus on studies assessing both improvements in air quality and associated health effects.

Methods: Interventions, defined as events aimed at reducing air pollution or where reductions occurred as a side effect, e.g. strikes, German reunification, from the 1960s onwards were considered for inclusion. This review is not a complete record of all existing air pollution interventions. In total, 28 studies published in English were selected based on a systematic search of internet databases.

Results: Overall air pollution interventions have succeeded at improving air quality. Consistently published evidence suggests that most of these interventions have been associated with health benefits, mainly by the way of reduced cardiovascular and/or respiratory mortality and/or morbidity. The decrease in mortality from the majority of the reviewed interventions has been estimated to exceed the expected predicted figures based on the estimates from time-series studies.

Conclusion: There is consistent evidence that decreased air pollution levels following an intervention resulted in health benefits for the assessed population.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2010 Apr;(148):3-23; discussion 25-33 - PubMed
    1. Environ Health Perspect. 2009 Mar;117(3):448-54 - PubMed
    1. Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Feb;112(2):179-85 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 2002 Mar 6;287(9):1132-41 - PubMed
    1. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2006 Jun;56(6):709-42 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources