Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Aug 1;18(15):4004-12.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0167. Epub 2012 May 16.

Design of a phase III clinical trial with prospective biomarker validation: SWOG S0819

Affiliations

Design of a phase III clinical trial with prospective biomarker validation: SWOG S0819

Mary W Redman et al. Clin Cancer Res. .

Abstract

The role of cetuximab in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is currently unclear. The molecular target of cetuximab, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), as measured by FISH, has shown potential as a predictive biomarker for cetuximab efficacy in NSCLC. SWOG S0819 is a phase III trial evaluating both the value of cetuximab in this setting and EGFR FISH as a predictive biomarker. This work describes the decision process for determining the design and interim monitoring plan for S0819. Six possible designs were evaluated in terms of their properties and the hypotheses that can be addressed within the design constraints. A subgroup-focused, multiple-hypothesis design was selected for S0819 that incorporates coprimary endpoints to assess cetuximab in both the overall study population and among EGFR FISH-positive (FISH(+)) patients, with the sample size determined based on evaluation in the EGFR FISH(+) group. The chosen interim monitoring plan specifies interim evaluations of both efficacy and futility in the EGFR FISH(+) group alone. The futility-monitoring plan to determine early stopping in the EGFR FISH-nonpositive group is based on evaluation within the positive group, the entire study population, and the nonpositive group. SWOG S0819 uses a design that addresses both the biomarker-driven and general-efficacy objectives of this study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Stopping boundaries on the hazard ratio scale for S0819, a subgroup-focused multiple-hypothesis design

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Herbst RS, Kelly K, Chansky K, Mack PC, Franklin WA, Hirsch FR, et al. Phase II selection design trial of concurrent chemotherapy and cetuximab versus chemotherapy followed by cetuximab in advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: Southwest Oncology Group study S0342. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28 (31):4747–4754. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gandara DR, Kim ES, Herbst RS. S0536: Carboplatin, paclitaxel, cetuximab followed by cetuximab and bevacizumab maintenance in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A SWOG phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(15s suppl):abst 8015. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pirker R, Pereira J, Szczesna A, von Pawel J, Krzakowski M, Ramlau R, et al. Cetuximab plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (FLEX): an open-label randomised phase III trial. Lancet. 2009;373 (9674):1525–1531. - PubMed
    1. Lynch T, Patel T, Dreisbach L, McCleod M, Heim W, Hermann R, et al. Cetuximab and first-line taxane/carboplatin chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of the randomized multicenter phase III trial BMS099. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(6):911–917. - PubMed
    1. Hirsch FR, Herbst RS, Olsen C, Chansky K, Crowley J, Kelly K, et al. Increased EGFR gene copy number detected by fluorescent in situ hybridization predicts outcome in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with cetuximab and chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(20):3351–3357. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms