Griffing's methods comparison for general and specific combining ability in cucumber
- PMID: 22593691
- PMCID: PMC3349209
- DOI: 10.1100/2012/524873
Griffing's methods comparison for general and specific combining ability in cucumber
Abstract
A comparison among two forms of half-diallel analysis was made. The different half-diallel techniques used were Griffing's model I, method 2 and 4. These methods of diallel analysis were found to be interrelated. However, as Griffing's model I, method 4 partitioned heterosis into different components as well as gave information about combining ability and this method had certainly some advantages over the other. The results further indicated using parental generations in the second Griffing method may cause biased estimate of the GCA and SCA variances. Thus, using the fourth Griffing method is more suitable than the other methods in providing time, cost, and facilities, and it is recommended as an applicable method.
References
-
- Sprague GF, Tatum LA. General vs specific combining ability in single crosses of corn. Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society. 1942;34:923–932.
-
- Griffing B. Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences. 1956;9:463–493.
-
- Kempthorne O. An Introduction to Genetic Statistic. Ames, Iowa, USA: Iowa State University Press; 1969.
-
- Mayo O. The Theory of Plant Breeding. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press; 1980.
-
- Gupta S, Kageyama S. Optimal complete diallel crosses. Biometrika. 1994;81(2):420–424.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources