Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review

Visual–Vestibular Integration for Self-Motion Perception

In: The Neural Bases of Multisensory Processes. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2012. Chapter 31.
Affiliations
Free Books & Documents
Review

Visual–Vestibular Integration for Self-Motion Perception

Gregory C. DeAngelis et al.
Free Books & Documents

Excerpt

How do we perceive our direction of self-motion through space? To navigate effectively through a complex three-dimensional (3-D) environment, we must accurately estimate our own motion relative to objects around us. Self-motion perception is a demanding problem in sensory integration, requiring the neural combination of visual signals (e.g., optic flow), vestibular signals regarding head motion, and perhaps also somatosensory and proprioceptive cues (Hlavacka et al. 1992, 1996; Dichgans and Brandt 1974). Consider a soccer player running downfield to intercept a pass and head the ball toward the goal. This athlete must be able to accurately judge the trajectory of the ball relative to the trajectory of his/her self-motion, in order to precisely time his/her head thrust to meet the ball. Optic flow and vestibular signals are likely the two most sensitive cues for judging self-motion (Gu et al. 2007, 2008; Fetsch et al. 2009). To understand the need for multisensory integration of these cues, it is useful to consider the strengths and weaknesses of each cue. Although self-motion generally involves both translations and rotations of the observer, we shall limit the scope of this review to translational movements, such that we focus on visual and vestibular cues that determine our perceived direction of heading.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Alais D, Burr D. The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration. Curr Biol. 2004;14:257–262.. - PubMed
    1. Anderson K.C, Siegel R. M. Optic flow selectivity in the anterior superior temporal polysensory area, STPa, of the behaving monkey. J Neurosci. 1999;19:2681–2692. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Angelaki D.E. Eyes on target: What neurons must do for the vestibuloocular reflex during linear motion. J Neurophysiol. 2004;92:20–35. - PubMed
    1. Angelaki D.E, Cullen K. E. Vestibular system: The many facets of a multimodal sense. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2008;31:125–150. - PubMed
    1. Angelaki D.E, Mchenry M. Q, Dickman J. D, Newlands S. D, Hess B. J. Computation of inertial motion: Neural strategies to resolve ambiguous otolith information. J Neurosci. 1999;19:316–327. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources