Multisensory Integration Develops Late in Humans
- PMID: 22593886
- Bookshelf ID: NBK92864
Multisensory Integration Develops Late in Humans
Excerpt
Recent studies suggest that human infants can transfer information gleaned from one sense to another (e.g., Streri 2003; Streri et al. 2004). For example, 1-month-old infants can visually recognize an object they have previously explored orally (Gibson and Walker 1984; Meltzoff and Borton 1979) and 2-month-old infants can visually recognize an object they have previously felt (Rose 1981; Streri et al. 2008). However, many of these studies show an asymmetry in the transfer (Sann and Streri 2007; Streri 2003; Streri et al. 2008) or a partial dominance of one modality over another (Lewkowicz 1988a, 1988b), supporting the idea that, even when multimodal skills are present, they are not necessarily fully mature. Recent results (Bremner et al. 2008a, 2008b) on the representation of peripersonal space support the presence of two distinct mechanisms in sensory integration with different developmental trends: the first, relying principally on visual information, is present during the first 6 months; the second, incorporating information of hand and body posture with visual, develops only after 6.5 months of age.
Over the past years, the majority of multisensory studies in infants and children have investigated the development of multisensory matching, transfer, and facilitation abilities, whereas few of those have investigated the development of multisensory integration. Those few that did investigate multisensory integration in school-age children point to unimodal dominance rather than integration abilities (Hatwell 1987; Klein 1966; McGurk and Power 1980; Misceo et al. 1999).
Copyright © 2012 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Sections
- 18.1. DEVELOPMENT OF MULTIMODAL PERCEPTION IN INFANCY AND CHILDHOOD
- 18.2. NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE FOR DEVELOPMENT OF MULTIMODAL INTEGRATION
- 18.3. DEVELOPMENT OF CUE INTEGRATION IN SPATIAL NAVIGATION
- 18.4. DEVELOPMENT OF AUDIOVISUAL CUE INTEGRATION
- 18.5. SENSORY EXPERIENCE AND DEPRIVATION INFLUENCE DEVELOPMENT OF MULTISENSORY INTEGRATION
- 18.6. DEVELOPMENT OF VISUO-HAPTIC INTEGRATION
- 18.7. CALIBRATION BY CROSS-MODAL COMPARISON?
- 18.8. HAPTIC DISCRIMINATION IN BLIND AND LOW-VISION CHILDREN: DISRUPTION OF CROSS-SENSORY CALIBRATION?
- 18.9. CONCLUDING REMARKS: EVIDENCE OF LATE MULTISENSORY DEVELOPMENT
- ACKNOWLEDGMENT
- REFERENCES
References
-
- Alais D, Burr D. The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration. Current Biology. 2004;14:257–62. - PubMed
-
- Alary F, Duquette M, Goldstein R, Elaine Chapman C, Voss P, La Buissonniere-Ariza V, Lepore F. Tactile acuity in the blind: A closer look reveals superiority over the sighted in some but not all cutaneous tasks. Neuropsychologia. 2009;47:2037–43. - PubMed
-
- Atkinson J. The developing visual brain. New York: Oxford Univ. Press; 2000.
-
- Bahrick L.E. Increasing specificity in perceptual development: Infants' detection of nested levels of multimodal stimulation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2001;79:253–70. - PubMed
-
- Bahrick L.E, Flom R, Lickliter R. Intersensory redundancy facilitates discrimination of tempo in 3-month-old infants. Developmental Psychobiology. 2002;41:352–63. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous