Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Aug;24(4):411-8.
doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs020. Epub 2012 May 16.

Feasibility of evaluating quality cancer care using registry data and electronic health records: a population-based study

Affiliations

Feasibility of evaluating quality cancer care using registry data and electronic health records: a population-based study

Adele Caldarella et al. Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the quality of patients care, a set of indicators of the standards of cancer care were defined.

Participants: We developed a set of indicators to assess the implementation in daily practice of recommendation produced by a regional network (Istituto Toscano Tumori). This set was tested in a retrospective study in the resident population of the Tuscany Region; the regional health system is organized on 12 local health authorities which refer to three macro areas (Area Vasta). The study included incident colorectal, lung and breast cancer cases listed in 2004 for the Tuscan Cancer Registry, a population-based registry which collected tumor cases diagnosed in all residents in Tuscany. Electronic data from registry database were used to determine the compliance with each indicator for patients in 2004. To validate the results, an ad hoc clinical survey including the same geographical area for the year 2006 was performed.

Intervention: None.

Main outcome measures: The proportion of patients who fulfilled each of the indicators.

Results: Our study showed the feasibility of the evaluation of the quality of cancer care using cancer registry population-based data and major computerized information systems. The estimation of the selected indicators confirmed a good homogeneity among areas, and globally revealed a good intraregional performance.

Conclusions: Further work is needed to develop specific quality measures, particularly about structural data and to continually revise indicators of quality of care. Data from a cancer registry, however, can be useful to evaluate quality of cancer care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources