Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul-Aug;18(4):326-33.
doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2012.01250.x. Epub 2012 May 21.

Reproducibility of BI-RADS breast density measures among community radiologists: a prospective cohort study

Affiliations

Reproducibility of BI-RADS breast density measures among community radiologists: a prospective cohort study

Mary C Spayne et al. Breast J. 2012 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Using data from the Vermont Breast Cancer Surveillance System (VBCSS), we studied the reproducibility of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast density among community radiologists interpreting mammograms in a cohort of 11,755 postmenopausal women. Radiologists interpreting two or more film-screen screening or bilateral diagnostic mammograms for the same woman within a 3- to 24-month period during 1996-2006 were eligible. We observed moderate-to-substantial overall intra-rater agreement for use of BI-RADS breast density in clinical practice, with an overall intra-radiologist percent agreement of 77.2% (95% confidence interval (CI), 74.5-79.5%), an overall simple kappa of 0.58 (95% CI, 0.55-0.61), and an overall weighted kappa of 0.70 (95% CI, 0.68-0.73). Agreement exhibited by individual radiologists varied widely, with intra-radiologist percent agreement ranging from 62.1% to 87.4% and simple kappa ranging from 0.19 to 0.69 across individual radiologists. Our findings underscore the need for additional evaluation of the BI-RADS breast density categorization system in clinical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Simple kappa versus number of assessment pairs per radiologist.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wolfe JN. Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern. Cancer. 1976;37:2486–2492. - PubMed
    1. Boyd NF, O’Sullivan B, Campbell JE, et al. Mammographic signs as risk factors for breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1982;45:185–193. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brisson J, Merletti F, Sadowsky NL, Twaddle JA, Morrison AS, Cole P. Mammographic features of the breast and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol. 1982;115:428–437. - PubMed
    1. Brisson J, Morrison AS, Kopans DB, et al. Height and weight, mammographic features of breast tissue, and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol. 1984;119:371–381. - PubMed
    1. Wolfe JN, Saftlas AF, Salane M. Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a case-control study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987;148:1087–1092. - PubMed

Publication types