Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 May 18:7:72.
doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-7-72.

Axillary lymph node dose with tangential whole breast radiation in the prone versus supine position: a dosimetric study

Kara Lynne Leonard  1 , David Solomon, Jaroslaw T Hepel, Jessica R Hiatt, David E Wazer, Thomas A DiPetrillo
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Axillary lymph node dose with tangential whole breast radiation in the prone versus supine position: a dosimetric study

Kara Lynne Leonard et al. Radiat Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: Prone breast positioning reduces skin reaction and heart and lung dose, but may also reduce radiation dose to axillary lymph nodes (ALNs).

Methods: Women with early stage breast cancer treated with whole breast irradiation (WBI) in the prone position were identified. Patients treated in the supine position were matched for treating physician, laterality, and fractionation. Ipsilateral breast, tumor bed, and Level I, II, and III ALNs were contoured according to the RTOG breast atlas. Clips marking surgically removed sentinel lymph nodes (SLN)s were contoured. Treatment plans developed for each patient were retrospectively analyzed. V90% and V95% was calculated for each axillary level. When present, dose to axillary surgical clips was calculated.

Results: Treatment plans for 46 women (23 prone and 23 supine) were reviewed. The mean V90% and V95% of ALN Level I was significantly lower for patients treated in the prone position (21% and 14%, respectively) than in the supine position (50% and 37%, respectively) (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Generally, Level II & III ALNs received little dose in either position. Sentinel node biopsy clips were all contained within axillary Level I. The mean V95% of SLN clips was 47% for patients treated in the supine position and 0% for patients treated in the prone position (p < 0.0001). Mean V90% to SLN clips was 96% for women treated in the supine position but only 13% for women treated in the prone position.

Conclusions: Standard tangential breast irradiation in the prone position results in substantially reduced dose to the Level I axilla as compared with treatment in the supine position. For women in whom axillary coverage is indicated such as those with positive sentinel lymph node biopsy who do not undergo completion axillary dissection, treatment in the prone position may be inappropriate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Axial and coronal images of Level I contoured (violet) for a patient treated in the (a) prone and (b) supine position.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of mean DVH data for patients treated in the prone and supine position.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Giuliano AE, McCall L, Beitsch P. et al.Locoregional recurrence after sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2010;252:426–433. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV. et al.Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis. JAMA. 2011;305:569–575. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.90. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Krasin M, McCall A, King S. et al.Evaluation of a standard breast tangent technique: A dose-volume analysis of tangential irradiation using three-dimensional tools. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;47:327–333. doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00449-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aristei C, Chionne F, Marsella AR. et al.Evaluation of level I and II axillary nodes included in the standard breast tangential fields and calculation of the administered dose: Results of a prospective study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;51:69–73. - PubMed
    1. Takeda A, Shigematsu N, Ikeda T. et al.Evaluation of novel modified tangential irradiation technique for breast cancer patients using dose–volume histograms. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;58:1280–1288. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.10.010. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types