EVENDOL, a new behavioral pain scale for children ages 0 to 7 years in the emergency department: design and validation
- PMID: 22609430
- DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.02.024
EVENDOL, a new behavioral pain scale for children ages 0 to 7 years in the emergency department: design and validation
Abstract
Numerous behavioral pain measures have been validated for young children, but none is appropriate to assess pain in emergency departments (EDs), where caregivers need a simple, easily completed scale. Our objective was to elaborate and validate a tool, relevant in any painful situation, with agitation or prostration, and for any age under 7 years. Five items (scored 0 to 3) were developed by pediatric pain and emergency caregivers. The new scale, called EVENDOL, was tested at children's arrival and after analgesics, at rest, and during mobilization. The validation study included 291 children from birth to 7 years old in 4 French EDs, and independent observations by the ED nurse and a researcher. The Cronbach coefficient was excellent (0.83 to 0.92). Construct validity was demonstrated by a decrease in scores after nalbuphine: 8.14 to 3.62 of 15 at rest (P<.0001), 11.87 to 6.65 at mobilization (P = .0011); by good correlations between EVENDOL and nurse or researcher numerical scores: 0.79 to 0.92 (P<.0001); by good correlations between children's self-assessment scores and EVENDOL in children ages 4 to 7 (0.64 to 0.93). Discriminant validity with tiredness, anxiety, and hunger was good. Interrater reliability was excellent between nurses and researcher (weighted kappa 0.7 to 0.9), and in a group of 6 nurses (simultaneous assessment of 122 videos). The treatment threshold was determined at 4 of 15. EVENDOL has excellent validity and can be used for all children under age 7 in EDs, for any age and any pain, acute as well as more prolonged.
Copyright © 2012 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
A measure of pediatric pain intensity across ages and clinical conditions.Pain. 2012 Aug;153(8):1545-1546. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.03.021. Epub 2012 Apr 20. Pain. 2012. PMID: 22521228 No abstract available.
-
Lost in translation: a cautionary note about presentation of non-English measures in English-language journals.Pain. 2013 Jun;154(6):960. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.02.029. Epub 2013 Mar 4. Pain. 2013. PMID: 23561270 No abstract available.
-
Translation and validation of a behavioural pain scale: what matters most?Pain. 2013 Jun;154(6):960-961. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.02.030. Epub 2013 Mar 7. Pain. 2013. PMID: 23582156 No abstract available.
-
Letter to the editor.Pain. 2014 Apr;155(4):834-835. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.04.034. Epub 2013 Apr 22. Pain. 2014. PMID: 23707269 No abstract available.
-
Response to letter to the Editor.Pain. 2014 Apr;155(4):835-836. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 Jan 10. Pain. 2014. PMID: 24418457 No abstract available.
References
-
- Alexander J, Manno M. Underuse of analgesia in very young pediatric patients with isolated painful injuries. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;41:617-622.
-
- Blount RL, Loiselle KA. Behavioural assessment of pediatric pain. Pain Res Manag. 2009;14:47-52.
-
- Boyd RJ, Stuart P. The efficacy of structured assessment and analgesia provision in the paediatric emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2005;22:30-32.
-
- Bringuier S, Picot MC, Dadure C, Rochette A, Raux O, Boulhais M, Capdevila X. A prospective comparison of post-surgical behavioral pain scales in preschoolers highlighting the risk of false evaluations. Pain. 2009;145:60-68.
-
- Cattell RB. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivar Behav Res. 1966;1:245-276.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical