Intramedullary nailing for paediatric diaphyseal forearm bone fracture
- PMID: 22609507
- DOI: 10.3126/kumj.v9i3.6305
Intramedullary nailing for paediatric diaphyseal forearm bone fracture
Abstract
Background: Though most of the pediatric diaphyseal forearm bone fracture can be treated with closed reduction and cast application, indications for operative intervention in pediatric both-bone forearm fractures include open fractures, irreducible fractures, and unstable fractures. Controversy exists as to what amount of angulation, displacement, and rotation constitutes an acceptable reduction.
Objective: To review union time and functional outcome of pediatric diaphyseal forearm bone fracture managed with intramedullary rush pin by closed or open reduction.
Methods: Fifty patients with both bone fracture of forearm were treated with intramedullary rush pin by closed or open reduction were included in the study and followed up for minimum six months for radiological and functional outcome.
Results: Out of 50 patients, 31 underwent closed reduction and 19 underwent open reduction. All fractures maintained good alignment post operatively. Forty seven patients had excellent results with normal elbow range of motion and normal forearm rotation and three patients had good results. In all patients good radiological union was seen in three months time. Eight patients had minor complications including skin irritation over prominent hardware, backing out of ulnar pin, superficial skin break down with exposed hardware. Twenty-three (46%) patients had undergone implant removal at an average of 6 months (range 4-8 months) under regional or general anesthesia.
Conclusion: Fixation with intramedullary rush pin for forearm fracture is an effective, simple, cheap, and convenient way for treatment in pediatric age group.
Similar articles
-
Complications and outcomes of diaphyseal forearm fracture intramedullary nailing: a comparison of pediatric and adolescent age groups.J Pediatr Orthop. 2013 Sep;33(6):598-607. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3182a11d3b. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013. PMID: 23872805
-
Single bone intramedullary fixation of the ulna in pediatric both bone forearm fractures: analysis of short-term clinical and radiographic results.J Pediatr Orthop. 2010 Jul-Aug;30(5):420-4. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181e00c44. J Pediatr Orthop. 2010. PMID: 20574256
-
Elastic stable intramedullary nailing in paediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures - a retrospective analysis of 201 cases.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Oct 28;25(1):855. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07959-0. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024. PMID: 39465363 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review: functional outcomes and complications of intramedullary nailing versus plate fixation for both-bone diaphyseal forearm fractures in children.Injury. 2014 Aug;45(8):1135-43. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.04.020. Epub 2014 May 2. Injury. 2014. PMID: 24845408
-
Intramedullary fixation of unstable forearm fractures in children.J South Orthop Assoc. 1999 Winter;8(4):269-74. J South Orthop Assoc. 1999. PMID: 12132800 Review.
Cited by
-
Intramedullary Flexible Nailing for Diaphyseal Fractures of Forearm Bones in Children.Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2019 Sep;54(5):503-508. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1693742. Epub 2019 Aug 27. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2019. PMID: 31736519 Free PMC article.
-
Stacked Flexible Nailing for Radius Ulna Fractures: Revival of a lost Technique.J Orthop Case Rep. 2017 Jan-Feb;7(1):106-108. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.713. J Orthop Case Rep. 2017. PMID: 28630854 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes of Management of Paediatric Bone Forearm Fractures using Titanium Elastic Nailing System: A Prospective Study of 50 Cases.J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Nov;10(11):RC12-RC15. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/22040.8917. Epub 2016 Nov 1. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016. PMID: 28050457 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Miscellaneous