Ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block versus fluoroscopy-guided transforaminal block for the treatment of radicular pain in the lower cervical spine: a randomized, blinded, controlled study
- PMID: 22609989
- DOI: 10.1007/s00256-012-1434-1
Ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block versus fluoroscopy-guided transforaminal block for the treatment of radicular pain in the lower cervical spine: a randomized, blinded, controlled study
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the short-term effects and advantages of ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block with fluoroscopy-guided transforaminal epidural block for radicular pain in the lower cervical spine through assessment of pain relief, functional improvement, and safety.
Methods: A total of 120 patients with radicular pain from cervical spinal stenosis or cervical herniated disc were enrolled. All procedures were performed using a fluoroscopy or ultrasound apparatus. The subjects were randomly assigned to either the fluoroscopy (FL) or ultrasound (US) group. The complication frequencies during the procedures, treatment effects, and functional improvement of the nerve root block were compared at 2 and 12 weeks after the procedures.
Results: Verbal Numeric Pain Scale (VNS) improved 2 weeks and 12 weeks after the injections in both groups. Statistical differences were not observed in VNS, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and effectiveness between the groups. In 21 patients at US, vessels were identified at the anterior aspect of the foramen. Eleven patients had a critical vessel at the posterior aspect of the foramen and five patients had on artery continue medially into the foramen, forming, or joining a segmental feeder artery. In both cases, the vessels might well have been in the pathway of the needle correctly positioned under fluoroscopic guidance. Five cases of intravascular injections were observed only in FL without significant difference between the groups.
Conclusions: The US-guided method may facilitate identifying critical vessels at unexpected locations relative to the intervertebral foramen and avoiding injury to such vessels, which is the leading cause of the reported complications from cervical transforaminal injections. On treatment effect, using either method of epidural injections to deliver steroids for cervical radicular pain, secondary to herniated intervertebral disc or foraminal stenosis, significant improvements in function and pain relief were observed in both groups after the intervention. However, significant difference was not observed between the groups. Therefore, the ultrasound-guided method was shown to be as effective as the fluoroscopy-guided method in pain relief and functional improvement, in addition to the absence of radiation and avoiding vessel injury at real-time imaging.
Similar articles
-
Ultrasound-Guided Selective Nerve Root Block versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Interlaminar Epidural Block versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Transforaminal Epidural Block for the Treatment of Radicular Pain in the Lower Cervical Spine: A Retrospective Comparative Study.Pain Res Manag. 2020 Jun 13;2020:9103421. doi: 10.1155/2020/9103421. eCollection 2020. Pain Res Manag. 2020. PMID: 32617125 Free PMC article.
-
Ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block versus fluoroscopy-guided interlaminar epidural block for the treatment of radicular pain in the lower cervical spine: a retrospective comparative study.J Ultrasound. 2019 Jun;22(2):167-177. doi: 10.1007/s40477-018-0344-z. Epub 2018 Dec 5. J Ultrasound. 2019. PMID: 30519991 Free PMC article.
-
An open-label non-inferiority randomized trail comparing the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided selective cervical nerve root block and fluoroscopy-guided cervical transforaminal epidural block for cervical radiculopathy.Ann Med. 2022 Dec;54(1):2681-2691. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2124445. Ann Med. 2022. PMID: 36164681 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Cervical radicular pain: the role of interlaminar and transforaminal epidural injections.Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2014 Jan;18(1):389. doi: 10.1007/s11916-013-0389-9. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2014. PMID: 24338702 Review.
-
Ultrasound-guided cervical selective nerve root injections: a narrative review of literature.Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 May;46(5):416-421. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-102325. Epub 2021 Jan 13. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021. PMID: 33441430 Review.
Cited by
-
Update in Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Research.Sports Health. 2016 Sep;8(5):429-37. doi: 10.1177/1941738116664326. Epub 2016 Aug 15. Sports Health. 2016. PMID: 27528698 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cervical foraminal steroid injections under CT guidance: retrospective study of in situ contrast aspects in a serial of 248 cases.Skeletal Radiol. 2015 Jan;44(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s00256-014-2028-x. Epub 2014 Oct 16. Skeletal Radiol. 2015. PMID: 25316168 Review.
-
Ultrasound versus fluoroscopy-guided caudal epidural steroid injection for the treatment of chronic low back pain with radiculopathy: A randomised, controlled clinical trial.Indian J Anaesth. 2016 Jun;60(6):388-92. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.183391. Indian J Anaesth. 2016. PMID: 27330199 Free PMC article.
-
Ultrasonography-Guided Perineural Injection of the Ramus ventralis of the 7 and 8th Cervical Nerves in Horses: A Cadaveric Descriptive Pilot Study.Front Vet Sci. 2020 Feb 25;7:102. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00102. eCollection 2020. Front Vet Sci. 2020. PMID: 32158773 Free PMC article.
-
Risk Analysis of Needle Injury to the Long Thoracic Nerve during Ultrasound-Guided C7 Selective Nerve Root Block.Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jun 19;57(6):635. doi: 10.3390/medicina57060635. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021. PMID: 34205371 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical