An innovative quality improvement curriculum for third-year medical students
- PMID: 22611330
- PMCID: PMC3355381
- DOI: 10.3402/meo.v17i0.18391
An innovative quality improvement curriculum for third-year medical students
Abstract
Background: Competence in quality improvement (QI) is a priority for medical students. We describe a self-directed QI skills curriculum for medical students in a 1-year longitudinal integrated third-year clerkship: an ideal context to learn and practice QI.
Methods: Two groups of four students identified a quality gap, described existing efforts to address the gap, made quantifying measures, and proposed a QI intervention. The program was assessed with knowledge and attitude surveys and a validated tool for rating trainee QI proposals. Reaction to the curriculum was assessed by survey and focus group.
Results: Knowledge of QI concepts did not improve (mean knowledge score±SD): pre: 5.9±1.5 vs. post: 6.6±1.3, p=0.20. There were significant improvements in attitudes (mean topic attitude score±SD) toward the value of QI (pre: 9.9±1.8 vs. post: 12.6±1.9, p=0.03) and confidence in QI skills (pre: 13.4±2.8 vs. post: 16.1±3.0, p=0.05). Proposals lacked sufficient analysis of interventions and evaluation plans. Reaction was mixed, including appreciation for the experience and frustration with finding appropriate mentorship.
Conclusion: Clinical-year students were able to conduct a self-directed QI project. Lack of improvement in QI knowledge suggests that self-directed learning in this domain may be insufficient without targeted didactics. Higher order skills such as developing measurement plans would benefit from explicit instruction and mentorship. Lessons from this experience will allow educators to better target QI curricula to medical students in the clinical years.
Keywords: experiential learning; quality improvement education; self-directed learning; undergraduate medical education.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Efficacy of quality improvement and patient safety workshops for students: a pilot study.BMC Med Educ. 2020 Apr 23;20(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-1982-3. BMC Med Educ. 2020. PMID: 32326951 Free PMC article.
-
Can first-year medical students acquire quality improvement knowledge prior to substantial clinical exposure? A mixed-methods evaluation of a pre-clerkship curriculum that uses education as the context for learning.BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Jul;27(7):576-582. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007566. Epub 2018 Mar 19. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018. PMID: 29555723
-
Evaluation of a Quality Improvement Experience for Family Medicine Clerkship Students.Fam Med. 2021 Nov;53(10):882-885. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2021.702090. Fam Med. 2021. PMID: 34780656
-
A realist synthesis of quality improvement curricula in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education: what works, for whom, and in what contexts?BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Apr;30(4):337-352. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-010887. Epub 2020 Oct 6. BMJ Qual Saf. 2021. PMID: 33023936 Review.
-
The State of Quality Improvement Teaching in Medical Schools: A Systematic Review.J Surg Educ. 2020 Jul-Aug;77(4):889-904. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.01.003. Epub 2020 Feb 10. J Surg Educ. 2020. PMID: 32057742
Cited by
-
Implementation and evaluation of an elective quality improvement curriculum for preclinical students: a prospective controlled study.BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jan 26;23(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04047-0. BMC Med Educ. 2023. PMID: 36703204 Free PMC article.
-
Medical students as agents of change: a qualitative exploratory study.BMJ Open Qual. 2018 Sep 4;7(3):e000420. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000420. eCollection 2018. BMJ Open Qual. 2018. PMID: 30234174 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of the Interprofessional Clinical Learning Environment for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety From Perspectives of Interprofessional Teams.J Grad Med Educ. 2021 Dec;13(6):822-832. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-01555.1. Epub 2021 Dec 14. J Grad Med Educ. 2021. PMID: 35070095 Free PMC article.
-
Identifying and Analyzing Systems Failures: An Interactive, Experiential Learning Approach to Quality Improvement for Clerkship-Level Medical Students.MedEdPORTAL. 2021 Apr 30;17:11151. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11151. MedEdPORTAL. 2021. PMID: 33948486 Free PMC article.
-
A model for training medical student innovators: the Harvard Medical School Center for Primary Care Abundance Agents of Change program.Med Educ Online. 2016 Jun 14;21:30662. doi: 10.3402/meo.v21.30662. eCollection 2016. Med Educ Online. 2016. PMID: 27306994 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Leape L, Berwick D, Clancy C, Conway J, Gluck P, Guest J, et al. Transforming healthcare: a safety imperative. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18:424–8. - PubMed
-
- Griner PF. Leadership strategies of medical school deans to promote quality and safety. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007;33:63–72. - PubMed
-
- Tsai TC, Bohnen JD, Hafiz S. Instruction in quality improvement and patient safety must be a priority in medical students’ education. Acad Med. 2010;85:743–4. - PubMed
-
- AAMC. Report V: contemporary issues in medicine: quality of care. Medical School Objectives Project. Available from: http://www.aamc.org/meded/msop/ [cited 13 October 2010]
-
- Berwick DM, Finkelstein JA. Preparing medical students for the continual improvement of health and health care: Abraham Flexner and the new “public interest”. Acad Med. 2010;85:S56–65. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous