Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Dec;57(12):2074-81.
doi: 10.4187/respcare.01800.

The effect of alveolar dead space on the measurement of end-expiratory lung volume by modified nitrogen wash-out/wash-in in lavage-induced lung injury

Affiliations

The effect of alveolar dead space on the measurement of end-expiratory lung volume by modified nitrogen wash-out/wash-in in lavage-induced lung injury

Rui Tang et al. Respir Care. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

Background: The accuracy of end-expiratory lung volume measurement by the modified nitrogen wash-out/wash-in method (EELV-N(2)) depends on the precise determination of carbon dioxide elimination (V(CO(2))), which is affected by alveolar dead space (V(D-alv)). The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of V(D-alv) on EELV-N(2).

Methods: Six piglets with lavage-induced acute lung injury were mechanically ventilated in a decremental PEEP trial that was reduced from 20 to 4 cm H(2)O in steps of 4 cm H(2)O every 10 min. EELV was measured by the modified EELV-N(2) method and computed tomography scan (EELV-CT), volumetric capnography, blood gas measurements, and hemodynamic data were recorded at each PEEP level. The data were divided into higher and lower PEEP groups.

Results: During the decremental PEEP trial, EELV-N(2) exhibited a high correlation (r(2) = 0.86, P < .001) with EELV-CT, with a bias of -48.6 ± 150.7 mL (1 ± 18%). In the higher PEEP group, EELV-N(2) was not correlated with EELV-CT, with a bias of -168.1 ± 171.5 mL (-14 ± 14%). However, in the lower PEEP group, EELV-N(2) exhibited a high correlation (r(2) = 0.86, P < .001) with EELV-CT, with a bias of 11.2 ± 97.2 mL (6 ± 17%). The measurement bias was negatively correlated with V(D-alv) (r(2) = 0.44, P = .04) and V(CO(2)) (r(2) = 0.47, P = .03) in the higher PEEP group.

Conclusions: In this surfactant-depleted model, EELV measurement by the modified EELV-N(2) method reveals a systematic underestimation at high PEEP levels that is partly due to an increase in V(D-alv).

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources