Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Jul 10;30(20):2516-21.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.5186. Epub 2012 May 21.

Effects of a brief multimedia psychoeducational intervention on the attitudes and interest of patients with cancer regarding clinical trial participation: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of a brief multimedia psychoeducational intervention on the attitudes and interest of patients with cancer regarding clinical trial participation: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Paul B Jacobsen et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: The negative attitudes of patients with cancer regarding clinical trials are an important contributor to low participation rates. This study evaluated whether a brief psychoeducational intervention was effective in improving patients' attitudes as well as their knowledge, self-efficacy for decision making, receptivity to receiving more information, and general willingness to participate in clinical trials.

Patients and methods: A total of 472 adults with cancer who had not been asked previously to participate in a clinical trial were randomly assigned to receive printed educational information about clinical trials or a psychoeducational intervention that provided similar information and also addressed misperceptions and concerns about clinical trials. The primary (attitudes) and secondary outcomes (knowledge, self-efficacy, receptivity, and willingness) were assessed via patient self-report before random assignment and 7 to 28 days later.

Results: Patients who received the psychoeducational intervention showed more positive attitudes toward clinical trials (P = .016) and greater willingness to participate (P = .011) at follow-up than patients who received printed educational information. Evidence of an indirect effect of intervention assignment on willingness to participate (estimated at 0.168; 95% CI, 0.088 to 0.248) suggested that the benefits of psychoeducation on willingness to participate were explained by the positive impact of psychoeducation on attitudes toward clinical trials.

Conclusion: A brief psychoeducational intervention can improve the attitudes of patients with cancer toward clinical trials and thereby increase their willingness to participate in clinical trials. Findings support conducting additional research to evaluate effects of this intervention on quality of decision making and rates of participation among patients asked to enroll onto therapeutic clinical trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
CONSORT diagram.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
Test of attitudes toward clinical trials as mediator of relationship between intervention assignment and willingness to participate in clinical trials. P values based on tests of significance of regression coefficients. a, direct effect of independent variable (IV) on mediator (M); b, direct effect of M on dependent variable (DV); c, direct effect of IV on DV; c′, indirect effect of IV on DV.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lara PN, Higdon R, Lim N, et al. Prospective evaluation of cancer clinical trial accrual patterns: Identifying potential barriers to enrollment. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:1728–1733. - PubMed
    1. McDaid C, Hodges Z, Fayter D, et al. Increasing participation of cancer patients in randomized controlled trials: A systematic review. Trials. 2006;7:16. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cox K, McGarry J. Why patients don't take part in cancer clinical trials: An overview of the literature. Eur J Cancer Care. 2003;12:114–122. - PubMed
    1. Fayter D, McDaid C, Eastwood A. A systematic review highlights threats to validity in studies of barriers to clinical trial participation. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:990–1001. - PubMed
    1. Mills EJ, Seely D, Rachlis B, et al. Barriers to participation in clinical trials of cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review of patient-reported factors. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:141–148. - PubMed

Publication types