Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;7(5):e37219.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037219. Epub 2012 May 15.

Developmental hippocampal neuroplasticity in a model of nicotine replacement therapy during pregnancy and breastfeeding

Affiliations

Developmental hippocampal neuroplasticity in a model of nicotine replacement therapy during pregnancy and breastfeeding

Ian Mahar et al. PLoS One. 2012.

Abstract

Rationale: The influence of developmental nicotine exposure on the brain represents an important health topic in light of the popularity of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) as a smoking cessation method during pregnancy.

Objectives: In this study, we used a model of NRT during pregnancy and breastfeeding to explore the consequences of chronic developmental nicotine exposure on cerebral neuroplasticity in the offspring. We focused on two dynamic lifelong phenomena in the dentate gyrus (DG) of the hippocampus that are highly sensitive to the environment: granule cell neurogenesis and long-term potentiation (LTP).

Methods: Pregnant rats were implanted with osmotic mini-pumps delivering either nicotine or saline solutions. Plasma nicotine and metabolite levels were measured in dams and offspring. Corticosterone levels, DG neurogenesis (cell proliferation, survival and differentiation) and glutamatergic electrophysiological activity were measured in pups.

Results: Juvenile (P15) and adolescent (P41) offspring exposed to nicotine throughout prenatal and postnatal development displayed no significant alteration in DG neurogenesis compared to control offspring. However, NRT-like nicotine exposure significantly increased LTP in the DG of juvenile offspring as measured in vitro from hippocampal slices, suggesting that the mechanisms underlying nicotine-induced LTP enhancement previously described in adult rats are already functional in pups.

Conclusions: These results indicate that synaptic plasticity is disrupted in offspring breastfed by dams passively exposed to nicotine in an NRT-like fashion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: RFT owns shares and participates in Nicogen Research Inc., a company focused on novel smoking cessation treatment approaches. No Nicogen funds were used in this work and no other Nicogen participants reviewed the manuscript. RFT has also consulted for Novartis and McNeil. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLoS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Offspring Weight.
Between postnatal day 2 (P2) and weaning (P21), the average weight of male pups exposed to maternal nicotine did not differ significantly from that of saline-exposed controls (ps = 0.16–0.94).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Plasma nicotine levels in nicotine-exposed dams and their breastfed pups.
Dam nicotine levels increased non-significantly between pregnancy and post-parturition (p = 0.14). E15: embryonic day 15; P7: postnatal day 7 days post-parturition.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Plasma corticosterone in pups.
Basal plasma corticosterone measured in juvenile pups exposed through breastfeeding to nicotine or saline (controls) from early embryogenesis. Corticosterone levels did not differ between groups (p = 0.67).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Cell proliferation.
DG proliferation assessed from Ki67-immunostained brain sections from juvenile (P15) and adolescent (P41) male offspring exposed to saline (controls) or nicotine throughout prenatal and postnatal development. Representative micrographs of Ki67-IR cells (arrows) in the subgranular zone or adjacent granule cell layer (gcl) in control P15 (A) and P41 (B) offspring. No significant difference in numbers of Ki67-IR cells was found in the dorsal hippocampus of P15 (C; p = 0.70) or P41 (D; p = 0.17) offspring. Scale bar = 25 µm.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Cell survival.
Developmental nicotine exposure did not affect survival of DG cells (p = 0.22). Survival of newborn cells was estimated from BrdU-immunostained brain sections in adolescent (P41) offspring exposed to saline (controls) or nicotine from early embryogenesis until weaning and injected with BrdU at P15.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Neuronal differentiation.
(A) Proportion of BrdU-IR cells differentiating into neurons in adolescent (P41) offspring exposed to saline (controls) or nicotine from early embryogenesis until weaning and injected with BrdU at P15 did not differ between groups (p = 0.48). (B) Orthogonal confocal image of a BrdU/NeuN-labeled DG cell (red: BrdU; green: NeuN). Scale bar = 10 µm.
Figure 7
Figure 7. Basal synaptic transmission.
Basal excitatory synaptic transmission was not affected by nicotine exposure. Upper panel: averaged traces of evoked field excitatory postsynaptic potential (fEPSP) recorded from the DG of P15 rat pups. The small depolarization ahead of fEPSP is the fiber volley, which represents the amount of activated presynaptic fibers. Basal excitatory synaptic transmission is therefore related to the ratio of fiber volley vs fEPSP at different stimulating currents (see the four averaged traces). We compared this ratio between control and nicotine-treated pups and found no differences between these two groups (lower panel: comparing slope of regression lines fitting fEPSPs and fiber volley amplitudes between two groups, p = 0.21).
Figure 8
Figure 8. Long-term potentiation.
Long-term potentiation was enhanced by nicotine exposure. Upper panel: Scattered plots of fEPSP against time revealed changes in fEPSP after long-term potentiation (LTP) induction by theta-burst stimulation. Note that LTP triggered in pups exposed to nicotine was stronger than that in control pups. Lower panel: Average traces of fEPSP obtained at time a (before LTP induction) and b (60 min after LTP induction) in representative recordings obtained from saline- and nicotine-exposed pups (% potentiation at 60 minutes after TBS: p = 0.037).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Al-Sahab B, Saqib M, Hauser G, Tamim H. Prevalence of smoking during pregnancy and associated risk factors among Canadian women: a national survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10:24. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cnattingius S. The epidemiology of smoking during pregnancy: smoking prevalence, maternal characteristics, and pregnancy outcomes. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004;6(Suppl 2):S125–140. - PubMed
    1. Bardy AH, Seppala T, Lillsunde P, Kataja JM, Koskela P, et al. Objectively measured tobacco exposure during pregnancy: neonatal effects and relation to maternal smoking. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;100:721–726. - PubMed
    1. Sanghavi DM. Epidemiology of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) for Kentucky infants born in 1990: maternal, prenatal, and perinatal risk factors. J Ky Med Assoc. 1995;93:286–290. - PubMed
    1. Batstra L, Hadders-Algra M, Neeleman J. Effect of antenatal exposure to maternal smoking on behavioural problems and academic achievement in childhood: prospective evidence from a Dutch birth cohort. Early Hum Dev. 2003;75:21–33. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms