Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Jun;61(6):1323-30.
doi: 10.2337/db11-1452.

Through the fog: recent clinical trials to preserve β-cell function in type 1 diabetes

Affiliations
Review

Through the fog: recent clinical trials to preserve β-cell function in type 1 diabetes

Carla J Greenbaum et al. Diabetes. 2012 Jun.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Effects of therapy to preserve β-cell function appear early. Solid black box is shown in each panel to emphasize time period of therapeutic effect. A: Circles represent the placebo group, and triangles represent the ChAglyCD3 group. Dashed lines show the glucose clamp–induced C-peptide release before glucagon injection and solid lines show after glucagon injection. Reprinted with permission; copyright Massachusetts Medical Society, 2005 (17). B: Area under the curve (AUC) C-peptide from 2-h mixed-meal tolerance test in placebo (solid line) and rituximab-treated (dashed line) subjects. The 95% confidence limits are shown at each time point within each group. Reprinted with permission; copyright Massachusetts Medical Society, 2009 (29). C: Population mean of stimulated C-peptide 2-h AUC mean over time for each treatment group (placebo, red; abatacept, blue). The estimates are from the ANCOVA model adjusting for age, sex, baseline value of C-peptide, and treatment assignment. Error bars show 95% CIs. Reprinted with permission from The Lancet (30).
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Deciding which therapies to bring to phase 2 clinical trial. To enhance confidence that a phase 2 clinical trial will prove efficacious, we must guard against evidential conservatism which is the tendency to base clinical inferences on narrow classes of evidence (47). Decisions about which therapy to bring to clinical trial have often been made by evaluation of results in a single animal model, another autoimmune disease, or by data collected with the aim to demonstrate the expected effect. In other words, in our enthusiasm to bring new discoveries to trial, we heavily weigh evidence that supports the new ideas. Before launching a full-scale clinical trial, dispassionate and systemic collection and review of the totality of data including in vitro studies with human samples and in vivo proof of mechanism clinical studies are needed.

Comment in

References

    1. Gottlieb PA, Quinlan S, Krause-Steinrauf H, et al. Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet MMF/DZB Study Group Failure to preserve beta-cell function with mycophenolate mofetil and daclizumab combined therapy in patients with new- onset type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2010;33:826–832 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wherrett DK, Bundy B, Becker DJ, et al. Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet GAD Study Group Antigen-based therapy with glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) vaccine in patients with recent-onset type 1 diabetes: a randomised double-blind trial. Lancet 2011;378:319–327 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ludvigsson J. Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes—Update on clinical Trials. Abstract presented at the 71st Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association, 24–28 June 2011, at the San Diego Convention Center, San Diego, California
    1. Ludvigsson J, Faresjö M, Hjorth M, et al. GAD treatment and insulin secretion in recent-onset type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1909–1920 - PubMed
    1. Schlosser M, Banga JP, Madec AM, et al. Dynamic changes of GAD65 autoantibody epitope specificities in individuals at risk of developing type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia 2005;48:922–930 - PubMed

MeSH terms