[The friction behavior of the ceramic bracket in arch wire-guided tooth movement]
- PMID: 2262178
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02168926
[The friction behavior of the ceramic bracket in arch wire-guided tooth movement]
Abstract
In spite of their wellknown disadvantages ceramic brackets are in great demand by orthodontic patients because of their aesthetic features. The amount of friction produced during tooth movement when a ceramic bracket slides along an arch wire, is still unknown. Using a custom-made friction test device the current study was undertaken to measure friction values of brackets of different manufactures with an 0.018 inch slot sliding along an 0.016 x 0.022 inch stainless steel arch wire. The results of this study showed that stainless steel brackets had slightly lower values than polycrystalline ceramic brackets. The monocrystalline bracket however showed significant greater friction values than both stainless steel and polycrystalline brackets even though its surface, as revealed with the scanning electron microscopy, proved to be quite smooth.
Similar articles
-
Comparative Evaluation of Frictional Resistance Between Different Types of Ceramic Brackets and Stainless Steel Brackets With Teflon-Coated Stainless Steel and Stainless Steel Archwires: An In-Vitro Study.Cureus. 2022 Apr 15;14(4):e24161. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24161. eCollection 2022 Apr. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 35586355 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of friction during sliding tooth movement in various bracket-arch wire combinations.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999 Sep;116(3):336-45. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70247-7. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999. PMID: 10474108
-
A comparative study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and arch wires.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991 Dec;100(6):513-22. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(91)70091-A. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991. PMID: 1962604
-
Coefficients of friction for arch wires in stainless steel and polycrystalline alumina bracket slots. I. The dry state.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990 Oct;98(4):300-12. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81487-8. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990. PMID: 2220691 Review.
-
Applications of nanotechnology in orthodontics: a comprehensive review of tooth movement, antibacterial properties, friction reduction, and corrosion resistance.Biomed Eng Online. 2024 Jul 25;23(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12938-024-01261-9. Biomed Eng Online. 2024. PMID: 39054528 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Biomechanical analysis of arch-guided molar distalization when employing superelastic NiTi coil springs.J Orofac Orthop. 1999;60(2):124-35. doi: 10.1007/BF01298962. J Orofac Orthop. 1999. PMID: 10220980 English, German.
-
Comparative evaluation of different debonding and reconditioning methods for orthodontic ceramic brackets regarding effectiveness for reuse : An in vitro study.J Orofac Orthop. 2025 Jan;86(1):11-23. doi: 10.1007/s00056-023-00469-z. Epub 2023 Jun 15. J Orofac Orthop. 2025. PMID: 37318554 Free PMC article.
-
Friction behavior of the wire material Gummetal®.J Orofac Orthop. 2022 Jan;83(1):59-72. doi: 10.1007/s00056-021-00317-y. Epub 2021 Jul 6. J Orofac Orthop. 2022. PMID: 34228140 Free PMC article.
-
Friction behavior of ceramic injection-molded (CIM) brackets.J Orofac Orthop. 2016 Jul;77(4):262-71. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0030-8. Epub 2016 May 3. J Orofac Orthop. 2016. PMID: 27142040 English.