Clinical effectiveness of percutaneous adhesiolysis using Navicath for the management of chronic pain due to lumbosacral disc herniation
- PMID: 22622905
Clinical effectiveness of percutaneous adhesiolysis using Navicath for the management of chronic pain due to lumbosacral disc herniation
Abstract
Background: Epidural steroid injection has been frequently performed to treat chronic pain due to lumbosacral disc herniation (L-HIVD). However, a considerable number of patients do not achieve pain relief using this method because perineural or epidural adhesions prevent the spread of injectate into the epidural space. Percutaneous adhesiolysis (PA) is thought to be a useful method because it can eliminate the deleterious effects of adhesion.
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of PA in managing chronic pain due to L-HIVD and the clinical and radiological predictive factors for the effectiveness of PA using NaviCath®.
Study design: Retrospective study
Setting: Spine hospital
Methods: From a group of patients diagnosed with L-HIVD, we selected the 86 patients who underwent PA with NaviCath® who had experienced chronic lower back or leg pain for at least 3 months and had failed to respond to anti-inflammatory medications or physical therapy of at least 1 month's duration and fluoroscopy guided transforaminal epidural injection. We recorded the Numeric Rating Scale for back pain (NRS back) and leg pain (NRS leg) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at pretreatment, 2 weeks, and 3 months after treatment. Clinical data and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings were obtained to assess the possible predictive factors for PA efficacy.
Limitations: Retrospective chart review without a control group.
Results: At 2 weeks after PA, significant improvement was observed in NRS back, NRS leg, and ODI compared with pretreatment. This improvement was maintained until 3 months after treatment. Among 86 patients, 61 (70.9%), 53 (61.6%) and 61 patients (70.9%) showed successful outcomes in NRS back, NRS leg, and ODI at 2 weeks, respectively. Among 74 patients who were followed up at 3 months, 47 (63.5%), 44 patients (59.5%), and 50 patients (67.6%) showed successful results in NRS back, NRS leg, and ODI at 3 months, respectively. A significantly higher proportion of patients with a history of previous lumbar surgery showed unsuccessful results on NRS back, NRS leg, and ODI scores at 2 weeks and 3 months. Co-existence of spinal stenosis was associated with a significantly higher proportion of unsuccessful results in NRS back and ODI at 2 weeks and 3 months, as well as NRS leg at 3 months. Patients with spondylolisthesis also showed a significantly higher proportion of unsuccessful results in NRS and ODI at 2 weeks.
Conclusion: PA with NaviCath® showed clinical effectiveness in the treatment of chronic pain due to L-HIVD that was not responsive to transforaminal epidural injection. Previous surgery and the presence of spinal stenosis or spondylolisthesis were poor prognostic predictors. This procedure may enable the physician to place the catheter tip and deliver medicine more precisely.
Similar articles
-
Clinical effectiveness of percutaneous adhesiolysis and predictive factors of treatment efficacy in patients with lumbosacral spinal stenosis.Pain Med. 2013 Oct;14(10):1497-504. doi: 10.1111/pme.12180. Epub 2013 Jun 26. Pain Med. 2013. PMID: 23802996
-
Evaluation of prognostic predictors of percutaneous adhesiolysis using a Racz catheter for post lumbar surgery syndrome or spinal stenosis.Pain Physician. 2013 Sep-Oct;16(5):E531-6. Pain Physician. 2013. PMID: 24077203
-
Comparison of the effectiveness of interlaminar and bilateral transforaminal epidural steroid injections in treatment of patients with lumbosacral disc herniation and spinal stenosis.Clin J Pain. 2009 Mar-Apr;25(3):206-10. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181878f9e. Clin J Pain. 2009. PMID: 19333170 Clinical Trial.
-
Percutaneous adhesiolysis in the management of chronic low back pain in post lumbar surgery syndrome and spinal stenosis: a systematic review.Pain Physician. 2012 Jul-Aug;15(4):E435-62. Pain Physician. 2012. PMID: 22828693
-
Comparison of clinical efficacy of transforaminal and caudal epidural steroid injection in lumbar and lumbosacral disc herniation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Spine J. 2018 Dec;18(12):2343-2353. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.06.720. Epub 2018 Jul 18. Spine J. 2018. PMID: 30030083
Cited by
-
Efficacy of Percutaneous Adhesiolysis in the Treatment of Lumbar Post Surgery Syndrome.Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Mar 7;6(2):e26172. doi: 10.5812/aapm.26172v2. eCollection 2016 Apr. Anesth Pain Med. 2016. PMID: 27574583 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effectiveness of continuous hypertonic saline infusion with an automated infusion pump for decompressive neuroplasty: a randomized clinical trial.Korean J Pain. 2019 Jul 1;32(3):196-205. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2019.32.3.196. Korean J Pain. 2019. PMID: 31257828 Free PMC article.
-
Epidural lysis of adhesions.Korean J Pain. 2014 Jan;27(1):3-15. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2014.27.1.3. Epub 2013 Dec 31. Korean J Pain. 2014. PMID: 24478895 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The effects of a forceful transforaminal epidural steroid injection on radicular pain: a preliminary study.Korean J Pain. 2014 Oct;27(4):334-8. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2014.27.4.334. Epub 2014 Oct 1. Korean J Pain. 2014. PMID: 25317282 Free PMC article.
-
Percutaneous Adhesiolysis Versus Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection for the Treatment of Chronic Radicular Pain Caused by Lumbar Foraminal Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Comparative Study.Ann Rehabil Med. 2015 Dec;39(6):941-9. doi: 10.5535/arm.2015.39.6.941. Epub 2015 Dec 29. Ann Rehabil Med. 2015. PMID: 26798608 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical