Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1990 Dec;19(6):1497-502.
doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(90)90362-n.

Intracranial ependymomas in children

Affiliations

Intracranial ependymomas in children

J W Goldwein et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1990 Dec.

Abstract

Between 1970 and 1988, 51 children with intracranial ependymal tumors (33-infratentorial, 18-supratentorial received initial treatment at the University of Pennsylvania. Therapy consisted of total or near total tumor resection in 15 patients and partial resection or biopsy in 36. Postoperative irradiation alone was given to 18, chemotherapy to 4, and a combination of these two modalities to 26. Patients have been followed for a median period of 7.75 years. The 5-year actuarial survival and progression-free survival (PFS) rates are 46% and 30%, respectively. Of the 30 patients who have progressed, 29 did so locally and one died before the site of failure could be determined. Six patients also had disease outside the primary site at relapse; three of them had received craniospinal irradiation. Local control was significantly better for patients whose tumor dose exceeded 4500 cGy (32% vs. 0%, p = .01) and for Caucasian patients (34% vs. 15%, p =.05). Survival was better for patients who were over 4 years of age at diagnosis (55% vs. 30%, p = .04), for patients who received local radiation doses above 4500 cGy (51% vs. 18%, p = .01), and for Caucasian patients (43% vs. 14%, p = .01). Extent of resection, histology, location, the use of cranial or craniospinal irradiation, and the use of chemotherapy did not significantly impact on survival. We conclude that the inability to control local disease remains the single most important factor leading to treatment failure. Older age, higher local radiation dose, and Caucasian race appear to be the only favorable prognostic factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources