Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;7(5):e37037.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037037. Epub 2012 May 18.

Socio-economic inequalities in the use of postnatal care in India

Affiliations

Socio-economic inequalities in the use of postnatal care in India

Abhishek Singh et al. PLoS One. 2012.

Abstract

Objectives: First, our objective was to estimate socio-economic inequalities in the use of postnatal care (PNC) compared with those in the use of care at birth and antenatal care. Second, we wanted to compare inequalities in the use of PNC between facility births and home births and to determine inequalities in the use of PNC among mothers with high-risk births.

Methods and findings: Rich-poor ratios and concentration indices for maternity care were estimated using the third round of the District Level Household Survey conducted in India in 2007-08. Binary logistic regression models were used to examine the socio-economic inequalities associated with use of PNC after adjusting for relevant socio-economic and demographic characteristics. PNC for both mothers and newborns was substantially lower than the care received during pregnancy and child birth. Only 44% of mothers in India at the time of survey received any care within 48 hours after birth. Likewise, only 45% of newborns received check-up within 24 hours of birth. Mothers who had home births were significantly less likely to have received PNC than those who had facility births, with significant differences across the socio-economic strata. Moreover, the rich-poor gap in PNC use was significantly wider for mothers with birth complications.

Conclusions: PNC use has been unacceptably low in India given the risks of mortality for mothers and babies shortly after birth. However, there is evidence to suggest that effective use of pregnancy and childbirth care in health facilities led to better PNC. There are also significant socio-economic inequalities in access to PNC even for those accessing facility-based care. The coverage of essential PNC is inadequate, especially for mothers from economically disadvantaged households. The findings suggest the need for strengthening PNC services to keep pace with advances in coverage for care at birth and prenatal services in India through targeted policy interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Differentials in postnatal care by place of childbirth.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Differentials in postnatal care by mode of childbirth.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Differentials in postnatal care by experience of maternal complications.

References

    1. Sines E, Syed U, Wall S, Worley H. Washington DC: Population Reference Bureau; 2007. Postnatal care: A critical opportunity to save mothers and newborns.
    1. Martines J, Paul VK, Bhutta ZA, Koblinsky M, Soucat A, et al. Neonatal survival: a call for action. The Lancet. 2005;365:1189–1197. - PubMed
    1. Baqui AH, Ahmed S, El Arifeen S, Darmstadt GL, Rosecrans AM, et al. Effect of timing of first postnatal care home visit on neonatal mortality in Bangladesh: a observational cohort study. British Medical Journal. 2009;339:b2826. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J. 4 million neonatal deaths: When? Where? Why? The Lancet. 2005;365:891–900. - PubMed
    1. Ronsman C, Graham W J. Maternal mortality: Who, when, where, and why? 2006. pp. 13–23. The Lancet, Maternal Survival Series. - PubMed

Publication types