The use of the finasteride-adjusted Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in a Mexican referral population: a validation study
- PMID: 22626812
- DOI: 10.1159/000338270
The use of the finasteride-adjusted Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in a Mexican referral population: a validation study
Abstract
Objectives: To perform the first validation study of the finasteride-adjusted Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator (finPCPTRC) in a contemporary referral population in Mexico.
Methods: 837 patients referred to the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico, between 2005 and 2009 were used to validate the finPCPTRC by examining various measures of discrimination and calibration. Net benefit curve analysis was used to gain insight into the use of the finPCPTRC for clinical decisions.
Results: Prostate cancer (PCa) incidence (72.8%) was high in this Mexican referral cohort and 45.7% of men who were diagnosed with PCa had high-grade lesions (HGPCa, Gleason score >6). 1.3% of the patients were taking finasteride. The finPCPTRC was a superior diagnostic tool compared to prostate-specific antigen alone when discriminating patients with PCa from those without PCa (AUC = 0.784 vs. AUC = 0.687, p < 0.001) and when discriminating patients with HGPCa from those without HGPCa (AUC = 0.768 vs. AUC = 0.739, p < 0.001). The finPCPTRC underestimated the risk of PCa but overestimated the risk of HGPCa (both p < 0.001). Compared with other strategies to opt for biopsy, the net benefit would be larger with utilization of the finPCPTRC for patients accepting higher risks of HGPCa.
Conclusions: Rates of biopsy-detectable PCa and HGPCa were high and 1.3% of this referral cohort in Mexico was taking finasteride. The risks of PCa or HGPCa calculated by the finPCPTRC were not well calibrated for this referral Mexican population and new clinical diagnostic tools are needed.
Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Similar articles
-
Prostate cancer risk prediction in a urology clinic in Mexico.Urol Oncol. 2013 Oct;31(7):1085-92. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.12.023. Epub 2012 Feb 3. Urol Oncol. 2013. PMID: 22306115 Free PMC article.
-
The prostate cancer risk calculator from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial underestimates the risk of high grade cancer in contemporary referral patients.J Urol. 2011 Feb;185(2):483-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.101. Epub 2010 Dec 17. J Urol. 2011. PMID: 21167519 Free PMC article.
-
PCPT: Evidence that finasteride reduces risk of most frequently detected intermediate- and high-grade (Gleason score 6 and 7) cancer.Urology. 2009 May;73(5):935-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.09.079. Epub 2009 Mar 28. Urology. 2009. PMID: 19328538 Clinical Trial.
-
Prostate cancer prevention with 5 alpha-reductase inhibitors.Recent Results Cancer Res. 2011;188:109-14. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-10858-7_9. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2011. PMID: 21253793 Review. No abstract available.
-
Prostate cancer prevention and finasteride.J Urol. 2006 Nov;176(5):2010-2; discussion 2012-3. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.045. J Urol. 2006. PMID: 17070238 Review.
Cited by
-
Death receptor 5 expression is inversely correlated with prostate cancer progression.Mol Med Rep. 2014 Nov;10(5):2279-86. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2014.2504. Epub 2014 Aug 21. Mol Med Rep. 2014. PMID: 25174820 Free PMC article.
-
Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators for Healthy Populations: Systematic Review.JMIR Cancer. 2021 Sep 3;7(3):e30430. doi: 10.2196/30430. JMIR Cancer. 2021. PMID: 34477564 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical