Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Aug;215(2):237-43.
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.04.018. Epub 2012 May 24.

Effect of introducing hematoma ultrasound-guided lumpectomy in a surgical practice

Gregory Larrieux  1 , Julie A Cupp, Junlin Liao, Carol E H Scott-Conner, Ronald J Weigel
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Effect of introducing hematoma ultrasound-guided lumpectomy in a surgical practice

Gregory Larrieux et al. J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Preoperative needle localization (NL) is the gold standard for lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast cancer. Hematoma ultrasound-guided (HUG) lumpectomy can offer several advantages. The purpose of this study was to compare the use of HUG with NL lumpectomy in a single surgical practice.

Study design: Patients with nonpalpable lesions who underwent NL or HUG lumpectomy from January 2007 to December 2009 by a single surgeon were identified from a breast surgery database. Ease of scheduling, volume excised, re-excision rates, operating room time, and health care charges were the main outcomes variables. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to compare the 2 groups.

Results: Lumpectomy was performed in 110 patients, 55 underwent HUG and 55 underwent NL. Hematoma ultrasound-guided lumpectomy was associated with a nearly 3-fold increase in the odds ratio of additional tissue being submitted to pathology (p = 0.039), but neither the total amount of breast tissue removed, nor the need for second procedure were statistically different between the 2 groups. Duration of the surgical procedure did not vary between the 2 groups; however, the time from biopsy to surgery was shorter for HUG by an expected 9.7 days (p = 0.019), implying greater ease of scheduling. Mean charges averaged $250 less for HUG than for NL, but this difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusions: Hematoma ultrasound-guided is equivalent to NL with regard to volume of tissue excised, need for operative re-excision, and operating room time. Adoption of HUG in our practice allowed for more timely surgical care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Preoperative breast ultrasound showing hematoma and biopsy clip. (B) X-ray of lumpectomy specimen showing biopsy clip and margin markers.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of the volume of total tissue removed.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Re-excision rates between hematoma ultrasound-guided and needle localization.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jakub JW, Gray RJ, Degnim AC, et al. Current status of radioactive seed for localization of non palpable breast lesions. Am J Surg. 2010;199:522–528. - PubMed
    1. Tomikawa M, Hong J, Shiotani S, et al. Real-time 3-dimensional virtual reality navigation system with open MRI for breast-conserving surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210:927–933. - PubMed
    1. Thompson M, Henry-Tillman R, Margulies A, et al. Hematoma-directed ultrasound-guided (HUG) breast lumpectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:148–156. - PubMed
    1. Gordon PB. Ultrasound for breast cancer screening and staging. Radiolog Clin N Am. 2002;40:431–441. - PubMed
    1. Nothacker M, Duda V, Hahn M, et al. Early detection of breast cancer: benefits and risks of supplemental breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with mammographically dense breast tissue. A systematic review. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:335. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms