Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2012 May 25;36(5):693-4.
doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.05.011.

Foxp3: shades of tolerance

Affiliations
Comment

Foxp3: shades of tolerance

Talal A Chatila et al. Immunity. .

Abstract

In this issue of Immunity, Darce et al. (2012) and Bettini et al. (2012) demonstrate that seemingly subtle alterations in the interaction of Foxp3 with its transcriptional partners have a ripple effect on the outcome of autoimmune phenotypes, worsening some while ameliorating others.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Altered Functions of EGFP-Foxp3 Fusion Protein Interactions of the N-terminal domain of the native Foxp3 protein with different cofactors (top). Dimeric Foxp3 proteins interact at their N-termini with a number of transcriptional factors and regulators, including among others the transcription factors Hif1α, IRF4, and Eos, the histone acetyltransferases (HATs) Tip60 and p300, and the histone deacetylase HDAC7. These interactions enable a number of cofactor dependent transcriptional circuitries and help regulate the levels of Foxp3 protein. Altered N-terminal domain interactions and Treg cell responses induced by the EGFP-Foxp3 fusion protein (bottom). The introduction of an N-terminal EGFP alters the interaction of the EGFP-Foxp3 fusion protein with the different co-factors, invigorating some interactions (e.g., with IRF4) while weakening or abolishing others (e.g., those with HATs, Eos, and Hif1α). These alterations impact the transcriptional landscape of Treg cells, potentiating their capacity to enforce tolerance against some autoimmune responses (e.g., autoantibody production in the K/BxN arthritis model) while weakening their response to others (e.g., Th1-driven type 1 diabetes in the NOD mouse).

Comment on

References

    1. Josefowicz SZ, Lu LF, Rudensky AY. Regulatory T cells: mechanisms of differentiation and function. Annu Rev Immunol. 2012;30:531–64. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Torgerson TR, Ochs HD. Immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked: forkhead box protein 3 mutations and lack of regulatory T cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;120:744–50. quiz 51-2. - PubMed
    1. Fontenot JD, Rasmussen JP, Williams LM, Dooley JL, Farr AG, Rudensky AY. Regulatory T cell lineage specification by the forkhead transcription factor foxp3. Immunity. 2005;22:329–41. - PubMed
    1. Darce J, Rudra D, Li L, Nishio J, Cipolletta C, Rudensky AY, et al. Divergent immunoregulation by a mutant FoxP3 protein: better arthritis, worse diabetes. Immunity. 2012 (in press)
    1. Bettini ML, Pan F, Bettini M, Finkelstein D, Rehg JE, Floess S, et al. Loss of Foxp3-driven epigenetic modification leads to regulatory T cell insufficiency. Immunity. 2012 (in press) - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources