A two step Bayesian approach for genomic prediction of breeding values
- PMID: 22640488
- PMCID: PMC3363154
- DOI: 10.1186/1753-6561-6-S2-S12
A two step Bayesian approach for genomic prediction of breeding values
Abstract
Background: In genomic models that assign an individual variance to each marker, the contribution of one marker to the posterior distribution of the marker variance is only one degree of freedom (df), which introduces many variance parameters with only little information per variance parameter. A better alternative could be to form clusters of markers with similar effects where markers in a cluster have a common variance. Therefore, the influence of each marker group of size p on the posterior distribution of the marker variances will be p df.
Methods: The simulated data from the 15th QTL-MAS workshop were analyzed such that SNP markers were ranked based on their effects and markers with similar estimated effects were grouped together. In step 1, all markers with minor allele frequency more than 0.01 were included in a SNP-BLUP prediction model. In step 2, markers were ranked based on their estimated variance on the trait in step 1 and each 150 markers were assigned to one group with a common variance. In further analyses, subsets of 1500 and 450 markers with largest effects in step 2 were kept in the prediction model.
Results: Grouping markers outperformed SNP-BLUP model in terms of accuracy of predicted breeding values. However, the accuracies of predicted breeding values were lower than Bayesian methods with marker specific variances.
Conclusions: Grouping markers is less flexible than allowing each marker to have a specific marker variance but, by grouping, the power to estimate marker variances increases. A prior knowledge of the genetic architecture of the trait is necessary for clustering markers and appropriate prior parameterization.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.J Dairy Sci. 2014 Oct;97(10):6547-59. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8210. Epub 2014 Aug 14. J Dairy Sci. 2014. PMID: 25129495
-
Variable selection models for genomic selection using whole-genome sequence data and singular value decomposition.Genet Sel Evol. 2017 Dec 27;49(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12711-017-0369-3. Genet Sel Evol. 2017. PMID: 29281962 Free PMC article.
-
Using markers with large effect in genetic and genomic predictions.J Anim Sci. 2017 Jan;95(1):59-71. doi: 10.2527/jas.2016.0754. J Anim Sci. 2017. PMID: 28177367
-
[Bayesian methods for genomic breeding value estimation].Yi Chuan. 2014 Feb;36(2):111-8. doi: 10.3724/sp.j.1005.2014.00111. Yi Chuan. 2014. PMID: 24846939 Review. Chinese.
-
Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.J Dairy Sci. 2009 Feb;92(2):433-43. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1646. J Dairy Sci. 2009. PMID: 19164653 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of analyses of the XVth QTLMAS common dataset III: Genomic Estimations of Breeding Values.BMC Proc. 2012 May 21;6 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S3. doi: 10.1186/1753-6561-6-S2-S3. Epub 2012 May 21. BMC Proc. 2012. PMID: 22640599 Free PMC article.
-
Modeling heterogeneous (co)variances from adjacent-SNP groups improves genomic prediction for milk protein composition traits.Genet Sel Evol. 2017 Dec 5;49(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12711-017-0364-8. Genet Sel Evol. 2017. PMID: 29207947 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous