Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 May 28;4(5):46.
doi: 10.1186/gm345.

Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidies: new technologies and clinical applications

Affiliations

Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidies: new technologies and clinical applications

Elisavet A Papageorgiou et al. Genome Med. .

Abstract

Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) has substantial medical importance as it targets the development of safer and more effective methods to avoid the risk of fetal loss associated with currently used invasive methods. Several approaches have been demonstrated as being proof-of concept for NIPD of chromosomal aneuploidies. These approaches include cell-based and cell-free detection methods, involving the investigation of fetal cells in the maternal circulation, formaldehyde treatment of maternal plasma, DNA methylation studies using sodium bisulfite or restriction enzymes, protein-based studies, identification of fetal-specific mRNAs and digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) approaches, and recently next-generation sequencing and methylated DNA immunoprecipitation real-time quantitative PCR-based approaches. Although all these NIPD methods have both advantages and limitations, some are moving closer to clinical implementation. Biotechnology companies dedicated to the development of NIPD tests such as the sequencing- or methylation-based approaches are finalizing large clinical trials. It is expected that these new technologies will facilitate safer, more sensitive and accurate prenatal diagnostic tests in the near future. In this review, we highlight the most recent advances in methods for NIPD of aneuploidies, and we discuss their future implications in clinical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Hulten MA, Dhanjal S, Pertl B. Rapid and simple prenatal diagnosis of common chromosome disorders: advantages and disadvantages of the molecular methods FISH and QF-PCR. Reproduction. 2003;126:279–97. doi: 10.1530/rep.0.1260279. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grimshaw G, Szczepura A, Hultén M, MacDonald F, Nevin N, Sutton F, Dhanjal S. Evaluation of molecular tests for prenatal diagnosis of chromosome abnormalities. Health Technol Assess. 2003;7:1–146. - PubMed
    1. Divane A, Carter NP, Spathas DH, Ferguson-Smith MA. Rapid prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidy from uncultured amniotic fluid cells using five-colour fluorescence in situ hybridization. Prenat Diagn. 1994;14:1061–1069. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970141109. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Driscoll DA, Gross S. Clinical practice. Prenatal screening for aneuploidy. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2556–2562. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp0900134. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hassold T, Abruzzo M, Adkins K, Griffin D, Merrill M, Millie E, Saker D, Shen J, Zaragoza M. Human aneuploidy: incidence, origin, and etiology. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1996;28:167–175. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2280(1996)28:3<167::AID-EM2>3.0.CO;2-B. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources