Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jun 25;172(12):947-53.
doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.2050.

A validated prediction tool for initial survivors of in-hospital cardiac arrest

Collaborators, Affiliations

A validated prediction tool for initial survivors of in-hospital cardiac arrest

Paul S Chan et al. Arch Intern Med. .

Abstract

Background: Accurate estimation of favorable neurological survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest could provide critical information for physicians, patients, and families.

Methods: Within the Get With the Guidelines-Resuscitation registry, we identified 42,957 patients from 551 hospitals admitted between January 2000 and October 2009 who were successfully resuscitated from an in-hospital cardiac arrest. A simple prediction tool for favorable neurological survival in patients successfully resuscitated from an in-hospital cardiac arrest was developed using multivariate logistic regression, with two-thirds of the sample randomly selected as the derivation cohort and one-third as the validation cohort. Favorable neurological status was defined as the absence of severe neurological deficits (cerebral performance category score of ≤2).

Results: Rates of favorable neurological survival were similar in the derivation cohort (7052 patients [24.6%]) and validation cohort (3510 patients [24.5%]). Eleven variables were associated with favorable neurological survival: younger age, initial cardiac arrest rhythm of ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia with a defibrillation time of 2 minutes or less, baseline neurological status without disability, arrest location in a monitored unit, shorter duration of resuscitation, and absence of mechanical ventilation, renal insufficiency, hepatic insufficiency, sepsis, malignant disease, and hypotension prior to the arrest. The model had excellent discrimination (C statistic of 0.80 for both the derivation and validation cohorts) and calibration. The prediction tool demonstrated the ability to identify patients across a wide range of rates of favorable neurological survival: patients in the top decile had a 70.7% probability of this outcome, whereas patients in the bottom decile had a 2.8% probability.

Conclusions: Among successfully resuscitated patients with an in-hospital cardiac arrest, a simple, bedside prediction tool provides robust estimates of the probability of favorable neurological survival. This tool permits accurate prognostication after cardiac arrest for physicians, patients, and families.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: Dr. Krumholz is a recipient of a research grant from Medtronic, Inc. through Yale University. The other authors report no potential conflicts of interest or disclosures.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparison of Predicted vs. Observed Outcome Rate for the Validation Cohort
Each data point represents a decile of risk for the outcome of favorable neurological survival to discharge.
Figure 2
Figure 2. The Cardiac Arrest Survival Post-Resuscitation In-hospital (CASPRI) Score Card and Nomogram for Favorable Neurological Survival
For this in-hospital cardiac arrest risk score, points for each variable are determined and a summary score is obtained. The corresponding likelihood of surviving to hospital discharge without severe neurological disability is determined from the risk table or plot.

Comment in

References

    1. George AL, Jr, Folk BP, 3rd, Crecelius PL, Campbell WB. Pre-arrest morbidity and other correlates of survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest. Am J Med. 1989 Jul;87(1):28–34. - PubMed
    1. Cohn EB, Lefevre F, Yarnold PR, Arron MJ, Martin GJ. Predicting survival from inhospital CPR: meta-analysis and validation of a prediction model. J Gen Intern Med. 1993 Jul;8(7):347–353. - PubMed
    1. Cooper S, Janghorbani M, Cooper G. A decade of in-hospital resuscitation: outcomes and prediction of survival? Resuscitation. 2006 Feb;68(2):231–237. - PubMed
    1. Peberdy MA, Kaye W, Ornato JP, et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation of adults in the hospital: a report of 14720 cardiac arrests from the National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2003 Sep;58(3):297–308. - PubMed
    1. Cummins RO, Chamberlain D, Hazinski MF, et al. Recommended guidelines for reviewing, reporting, and conducting research on in-hospital resuscitation: the inhospital ‘Utstein style’. American Heart Association. Circulation. 1997 Apr 15;95(8):2213–2239. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms