Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jun 25;172(12):938-45.
doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.2253.

Monitoring performance for blood pressure management among patients with diabetes mellitus: too much of a good thing?

Eve A Kerr  1 , Michelle A Lucatorto, Rob Holleman, Mary M Hogan, Mandi L Klamerus, Timothy P Hofer; VA Diabetes Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) Workgroup on Clinical Action Measures
Collaborators, Affiliations

Monitoring performance for blood pressure management among patients with diabetes mellitus: too much of a good thing?

Eve A Kerr et al. Arch Intern Med. .

Abstract

Background: Performance measures that reward achieving blood pressure (BP) thresholds may contribute to overtreatment. We developed a tightly linked clinical action measure designed to encourage appropriate medical management and a marker of potential overtreatment, designed to monitor overly aggressive treatment of hypertension in the face of low diastolic BP.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in 879 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers and smaller community-based outpatient clinics. The clinical action measure for hypertension was met if the patient had a passing index BP at the visit or had an appropriate action. We examined the rate of passing the action measure and of potential overtreatment in the Veterans Health Administration during 2009-2010.

Results: There were 977,282 established VA patients, 18 years and older, with diabetes mellitus (DM). A total of 713,790 patients were eligible for the action measure; 94% passed the measure (82% because they had a BP <140/90 mm Hg at the visit and an additional 12% with a BP ≥140/90 mm Hg and appropriate clinical actions). Facility pass rates varied from 77% to 99% (P < .001). Among all patients with DM, 197,291 (20%) had a BP lower than 130/65 mm Hg; of these, 80 903 (8% of all patients with DM) had potential overtreatment. Facility rates of potential overtreatment varied from 3% to 20% (P < .001). Facilities with higher rates of meeting the current threshold measure (<140/90 mm Hg) had higher rates of potential overtreatment (P < .001).

Conclusions: While 94% of diabetic veterans met the action measure, rates of potential overtreatment are currently approaching the rate of undertreatment, and high rates of achieving current threshold measures are directly associated with overtreatment. Implementing a clinical action measure for hypertension management, as the Veterans Health Administration is planning to do, may result in more appropriate care and less overtreatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The Tightly-linked Clinical Action Measure and the Marker of Potential Overtreatment among Patients with Diabetes a. The clinical action measure is met for patients (18-75 years old) when: b: The marker of potential overtreament is met for patients (18+ years old) when:
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patients Meeting the Clinical Action Measure or the Marker of Potential Overtreatment a. Quality of care by the linked action measure is met in 94% of patients b. 8% patients with diabetes have potential hypertension overtreatment
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patients Meeting the Clinical Action Measure or the Marker of Potential Overtreatment a. Quality of care by the linked action measure is met in 94% of patients b. 8% patients with diabetes have potential hypertension overtreatment
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Egan BM, Zhao Y, Axon RN. US trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension, 1988-2008. JAMA. 2010;303(20):2043–2050. - PubMed
    1. Engelgau MM, Geiss LS, Saaddine JB, et al. The evolving diabetes burden in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140(11):945–950. - PubMed
    1. Preis SR, Pencina MJ, Hwang SJ, et al. Trends in cardiovascular disease risk factors in individuals with and without diabetes mellitus in the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2009;120(3):212–220. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Snow V, Weiss KB, Mottur-Pilson C. The Evidence Base for Tight Blood Pressure Control in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(7):587–592. - PubMed
    1. Asch SM, McGlynn EA, Hogan MM, et al. Comparison of quality of care for patients in the Veterans Health Administration and patients in a national sample. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141(12):938–945. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances