Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Sep;41(10):1239-44.
doi: 10.1007/s00256-012-1436-z. Epub 2012 May 29.

Introduction of an alternative standardized radiographic measurement method to evaluate volar angulation in subcapital fractures of the 5th metacarpal

Thomas Hoffelner  1 , Herbert Resch, Philipp Moroder, Gundobert Korn, Felix Steinhauer, Jörg Atzwanger, Bernd Minnich, Mark Tauber
Affiliations

Introduction of an alternative standardized radiographic measurement method to evaluate volar angulation in subcapital fractures of the 5th metacarpal

Thomas Hoffelner et al. Skeletal Radiol. 2012 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of the present study was to compare the intra- and interobserver reliability of two different measurement methods for volar angulation of the 5th metacarpal (MC) in an attempt to establish a new standard measurement method to reduce interobserver discrepancies for therapeutic decisions.

Materials and methods: Twenty patients with subcapital fractures of the 5th MC were radiologically investigated. Imaging consisted of a radiographs in antero-posterior and precise lateral view in addition to a CT scan of the 5th MC. Measurement of volar angulation was accomplished using the conventional and the shaft articular surface (SAS) method. The measurements of five investigators were exported to a spreadsheet for statistical analysis to evaluate the intra-and interobserver reliability.

Results: The conventional technique showed large differences among the investigators and poor interobserver reliability (W = 0.328 and 0.307) both at injury (p = 0.001) and at follow-up (p = 0.189). The intraobserver concordance of all investigators showed better results with the SAS than with the conventional technique. With the SAS technique, no statistically significant difference among the investigators could be detected at either the time of injury (p = 0.418) or at follow-up (p = 0.526) with excellent interobserver reliability (W = 0.051 and W = 0.041). Evaluation of volar angulation at follow-up using CT scans did not show any statistically significant difference between the techniques with better correlation among the observers with the SAS technique (p = 0.838).

Conclusions: The interobserver correlation of volar angulation with lateral radiographs using the conventional technique was insufficient. Therefore, we recommend the use of the novel SAS technique as standardized measurement method which showed higher accuracy and interobserver reliability in order to facilitate the choice of adequate treatment option.

Clinical relevance: A CT scan should be performed in cases with ambivalent treatment options.

Level of evidence: Evidence-Based Medicine Level II.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010 Apr;92(3):236-9; quiz 239 - PubMed
    1. J Hand Surg Br. 1996 Apr;21(2):230-6 - PubMed
    1. J Orthop Res. 2006 Jan;24(1):37-45 - PubMed
    1. Hand (N Y). 2007 Dec;2(4):212-7 - PubMed
    1. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2007 Dec;32(6):641-6 - PubMed