Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 May 30:12:53.
doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-53.

Attitudes toward concordance in psychiatry: a comparative, cross-sectional study of psychiatric patients and mental health professionals

Carlos De las Cuevas  1 , Amado Rivero-Santana, Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez, Jeanette Pérez-Ramos, Pedro Serrano-Aguilar
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Attitudes toward concordance in psychiatry: a comparative, cross-sectional study of psychiatric patients and mental health professionals

Carlos De las Cuevas et al. BMC Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: Concordance and Shared Decision-Making (SDM) are considered measures of the quality of care that improves communication, promotes patient participation, creates a positive relationship with the healthcare professional, and results in greater adherence with the treatment plan.

Methods: This study compares the attitudes of 225 mental health professionals (125 psychiatrists and 100 psychiatry registrars) and 449 psychiatric outpatients towards SDM and concordance in medicine taking by using the "Leeds Attitude toward Concordance Scale" (LATCon).

Results: The internal consistency of the scale was good in all three samples (Cronbach's α: patients = 0.82, psychiatrists = 0.76, and registrars = 0.82). Patients scored significantly lower (1.96 ± 0.48) than professionals (P < .001 in both cases), while no statistically significant differences between psychiatrists (2.32 ± 0.32) and registrars (2.23 ± 0.35) were registered; the three groups showed a positive attitude towards concordance in most indicators. Patients are clearly in favor of being informed and that their views and preferences be taken into account during the decision-making process, although they widely consider that the final decision must be the doctor's responsibility. Among mental health professionals, the broader experience provides a greater conviction of the importance of the patient's decision about treatment.

Conclusions: We observed a positive attitude towards concordance in the field of psychotropic drugs prescription both in professionals and among patients, but further studies are needed to address the extent to which this apparently accepted model is reflected in the daily practice of mental health professionals.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Nair K, Dolovich L, Cassels A, McCormack J, Levine M, Gray J, Mann K, Burns S. What patients want to know about their medications. Focus group study of patient and clinician perspectives. Can Fam Physician. 2002;48:104–110. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Laine C, Davidoff F. Patient-centered medicine. A professional evolution. JAMA. 1996;275:152–156. doi: 10.1001/jama.1996.03530260066035. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith RC, Marshall-Dorsey AA, Osborn GG, Shebroe V, Lyles JS, Stoffelmayr BE, Van Egeren LF, Mettler J, Maduschke K, Stanley JM, Gardiner JC. Evidence-based guidelines for teaching patient-centered interviewing. Patient Educ Couns. 2000;39:27–36. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(99)00088-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centred consultations and outcomes in primary care: a review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;48:51–61. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00099-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stewart M. Towards a global definition of patient centred care. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 2001;322(7284):444–445. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7284.444. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types