Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 May 29;13(5):158.
doi: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-5-158.

Power to the people: a wiki-governance model for biobanks

Affiliations

Power to the people: a wiki-governance model for biobanks

Edward S Dove et al. Genome Biol. .

Abstract

Biobanks are adopting various modes of public engagement to close the agency gap between participants and biobank builders. We propose a wiki-governance model for biobanks that harnesses Web 2.0, and which gives citizens the ability to collaborate in biobank governance and policymaking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A wiki-governance model for biobanks. In the proposed wiki-governance model, (1) interested individuals would register on a secure-access website that houses component parts of a biobank governance structure. (2) These publics, with assistance from biobank insiders (such as managers and researchers), policy consultants, and IT-savvy wiki-moderators, would then shape policy content via various networking tools, such as comment and discussion boards, virtual forums and polls. (3) The policy content would then be molded into workable policies and guidelines via drafts; a final version would be determined by the biobank management committee, acting as arbiter, and possibly voted on by the publics. (4) A collaborative biobank governance infrastructure would then be reached. However, a continuous feedback loop is employed so that as significant science, technology and socio-legal developments arise, publics can better assess the impact and dynamics of genomics research [64], challenge existing governance policies and procedures, and help shape future ones.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hunter KG, Laurie G. In: The Governance of Genetic Information: Who Decides? Widdows H, editor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. Involving publics in biobank governance: Moving beyond existing approaches. pp. 151–177.
    1. Burgess M, O'Doherty K, Secko D. Biobanking in British Columbia: discussions of the future of personalized medicine through deliberative public engagement. Per Med. 2009;5:285–296. doi: 10.2217/17410541.5.3.285. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Avard D, Bucci LM, Burgess MM, Kaye J, Heeney C, Cambon-Thomsen A. Public health genomics (PHG) and public participation: points to consider. J Public Deliberation. 2009;5:2–21. http://services.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1068&context...
    1. Dove ES. The genetic privacy carousel: a discourse on proposed genetic privacy bills and the co-evolution of law and science. Curr Pharmacogenomics Person Med. 2011;9:252–263. doi: 10.2174/187569211798377207. - DOI
    1. Marris C, Rose N. Open engagement: exploring public participation in the biosciences. PLoS Biol. 2010;8:e1000549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000549. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources