Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Dec;22(6):996-1003.
doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2012.05.003. Epub 2012 May 29.

Motor control is decision-making

Affiliations
Review

Motor control is decision-making

Daniel M Wolpert et al. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

Motor behavior may be viewed as a problem of maximizing the utility of movement outcome in the face of sensory, motor and task uncertainty. Viewed in this way, and allowing for the availability of prior knowledge in the form of a probability distribution over possible states of the world, the choice of a movement plan and strategy for motor control becomes an application of statistical decision theory. This point of view has proven successful in recent years in accounting for movement under risk, inferring the loss function used in motor tasks, and explaining motor behavior in a wide variety of circumstances.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The optimal choice depends on the prior, likelihood and loss function. In this schematic we consider pointing to the location of a target in one dimension. The top row shows two different possible priors (red curves) for target locations that might be imposed by task conditions, a mixture of two Gaussians (left) or a uniform prior over limited range (right). When the target is seen, the noisy sensory data specify a likelihood (blue curves). In this case the visual location of the target has been corrupted by Gaussian noise. The posterior probability (green curves) is the point-wise product of the prior and the likelihood (renormalized so that the area under the curve is one). The final decision depends on the loss function. Two possible loss functions are shown, one in which the loss increases quadratically (black curve) and the other in which it increases linearly (magenta) with error. The optimal estimate, shown by the arrows and lines on the posterior, depends on all three components.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) In a rapid reaching task, subjects are awarded points (as indicated) for landing in the green target and penalties for landing in the red penalty region. (b) A typical gain landscape reflecting the, expected gain as a function of aimpoint. The expected gain takes into account subjects’ motor variability.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Three stages of sensory and motor decisions: Bayesian inference, decision-making and credit assignment. We cross-reference the primary focus of the articles we have surveyed to the elements of sensory/motor decision processes.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Trommershäuser J, Maloney LT, Landy MS. Decision making, movement planning and statistical decision theory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2008;12:291–297. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Trommershäuser J, Maloney LT, Landy MS. The Expected Utility of Movement. In: Glimcher PW, Camerer CF, Fehr E, Poldrack RA, editors. Neuroeconomics: Decision Making and the Brain. Academic Press; 2009. pp. 95–111.
    1. Berniker M, Körding K. Bayesian approaches to sensory integration for motor control. WIREs Cogn Sci. 2011;2:419–428. - PubMed
    1. Maloney LT, Zhang H. Decision-theoretic models of visual perception and action. Vision Research. 2010;50:2362–2374. - PubMed
    1. Braun DA, Nagengast AJ, Wolpert DM. Risk-Sensitivity in Sensorimotor Control. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2011;5:1:1–1:10. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms