Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jun;90(6):1972-85.
doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4077.

Weaning management of newly received beef calves with or without continuous exposure to a persistently infected bovine viral diarrhea virus pen mate: effects on health, performance, bovine viral diarrhea virus titers, and peripheral blood leukocytes

J T Richeson  1 , E B Kegley, J G Powell, P A Beck, B L Vander Ley, J F Ridpath
Affiliations

Weaning management of newly received beef calves with or without continuous exposure to a persistently infected bovine viral diarrhea virus pen mate: effects on health, performance, bovine viral diarrhea virus titers, and peripheral blood leukocytes

J T Richeson et al. J Anim Sci. 2012 Jun.

Abstract

Exposure to animals persistently infected (PI) with bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) results in immunomodulation of cohorts that may have health and growth consequences; however, effects may differ in low-risk, preconditioned (PC) vs. high-risk, auction market (AM) beef cattle. Our objective was to compare health and performance of PC or AM management systems with (PI) or without (CON) presence of a PI-BVDV pen mate using a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement. Four shipment blocks of crossbred PC steers (n = 236) from 3 ranch-origins were weaned, dewormed, vaccinated, tested for PI-BVDV, and kept on the ranch for ≥42 d. Subsequently, PC steers were transported to a stocker receiving unit (RU), weighed (251 ± 2 kg), blood sampled, stratified by d -1 BW, and assigned randomly to treatment (PCPI or PCCON) with no additional processing. Simultaneously, 4 blocks of crossbred AM calves (n = 292) were assembled from regional auction markets and transported to the RU ± 36 h from PC arrival. The AM calves were weighed (245 ± 1.3 kg), stratified by gender and d -1 BW, processed under the same regimen used for PC steers at their origin ranch except bull calves were castrated, and then assigned randomly to treatment (AMPI or AMCON). Treatment pens (0.45 ha) were arranged spatially such that PI did not have fence-line or water source contact with CON. Calves were fed identically and followed the same antibiotic treatment protocol. Daily BW gain for the entire 42-d receiving trial was greater (P < 0.001) for PC (1.2 kg) compared with AM (0.85 kg). There was an exposure effect (P = 0.002) on ADG from d 28 to 42; CON gained 1.12 kg vs. 0.90 kg BW for PI cohort. Morbidity was markedly greater (P < 0.001) in AM (70%) vs. PC (7%), resulting in (P < 0.001) an antibiotic treatment cost of $20.52 and $2.48/animal, respectively. Treatment with a third antibiotic occurred more often (P = 0.04) for PI cohort, and the percentage of chronically ill cattle was greatest (P = 0.06) for AMPI. Upon arrival, BVDV type 1a, 1b, and 2a titers were greater for PC (treatment × day, P < 0.001), and the percentage seropositive to BVDV type 1a on d 0 was 100% for PC vs. 23% in AM. Platelets increased transiently (P < 0.001) with greater platelets observed in AM (P < 0.001). Results indicate that PC calves gain faster and require fewer antibiotic treatments during the receiving period. Exposure to PI reduced BW gain from d 28 to 42, increased the number of calves treated thrice, and increased chronically ill cattle for AM.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Illustration (not to scale) of spatial treatment arrangement of newly received calves located at UA Experiment Station (RU). AMCON = auction market, control; AMPI = auction market, exposed to a persistently infected (PI) bovine viral diarrhea virus (PI-BVDV) pen mate; PCCON = preconditioned, control; PCPI = preconditioned, exposed to a PI-BVDV pen mate.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Effects of weaning management and persistently infected bovine viral diarrhea virus (PI-BVDV) exposure on individual serum antibody concentrations against BVDV type 1a (Singer strain). Effect of treatment × day (P < 0.001), day (P < 0.001), and management (P < 0.001). Means within a day without a common superscript differ (P ≤ 0.05). AMCON = auction market, control; AMPI = auction market, exposed to a PI-BVDV pen mate; PCCON = preconditioned, control; PCPI = preconditioned, exposed to a PI-BVDV pen mate.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Effects of weaning management and persistently infected bovine viral diarrhea virus (PI-BVDV) exposure on pooled serum antibody concentrations against BVDV type 1a (NADL strain). Effect of treatment × day (P < 0.001), day (P < 0.001), and management (P < 0.001). Means without a common superscript differ (P ≤ 0.05). AMCON = auction market, control; AMPI = auction market, exposed to a PI-BVDV pen mate; PCCON = preconditioned, control; PCPI = preconditioned, exposed to a PI-BVDV pen mate.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Effects of weaning management and persistently infected bovine viral diarrhea virus (PI-BVDV) exposure on pooled serum antibody concentrations against BVDV type 1b. Effect of treatment × day (P < 0.001), day (P < 0.001), and management (P < 0.001). Means without a common superscript differ (P ≤ 0.05). AMCON = auction market, control; AMPI = auction market, exposed to continuous PI-BVDV challenge; PCCON = preconditioned, control; PCPI = preconditioned, exposed to a PI-BVDV pen mate.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Effects of weaning management and persistently infected bovine viral diarrhea virus (PI-BVDV) exposure on pooled serum antibody concentrations against BVDV type 2. Effect of treatment × day (P < 0.001), day (P < 0.001), and management (P < 0.001). Means without a common superscript differ (P ≤ 0.05). AMCON = auction market, control; AMPI = auction market, exposed to a PI-BVDV pen mate; PCCON = preconditioned, control; PCPI = preconditioned, exposed to a PI-BVDV pen mate.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Effects of weaning management and persistently infected bovine viral diarrhea virus (PI-BVDV) exposure on hematology of newly received beef calves. AMCON = auction market, control; AMPI = auction market, exposed to a PI-BVDV pen mate; PCCON = preconditioned, control; PCPI = preconditioned, exposed to a PI-BVDV pen mate. Neutrophils, %: effect of treatment × day (P = 0.002) and management (P = 0.002). Lymphocytes, %: effect of treatment × day (P = 0.004) and management (P < 0.001). Lymphocytes: effect of day (P = 0.005), treatment × day (P = 0.02), and management (P < 0.001). Neutrophil:lymphocyte: effect of treatment × day (P = 0.001) and management (P < 0.001).
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Effects of weaning management and persistently infected bovine viral diarrhea virus (PI-BVDV) exposure on hematology of newly received beef calves. AMCON = auction market, control; AMPI = auction market, exposed to a PI-BVDV pen mate; PCCON = preconditioned, control; PCPI = preconditioned, exposed to a PI-BVDV pen mate. Red blood cells: effect of day (P < 0.001), treatment × day (P < 0.001), and exposure (P = 0.10). Hemoglobin: effect of day (P < 0.001), treatment × day (P < 0.001), and exposure (P = 0.07). Hematocrit, %: effect of day (P < 0.001), treatment × day (P < 0.001), and exposure (P = 0.09). Platelets: effect of day (P < 0.001), treatment × day (P = 0.03), and management (P = 0.002).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bolin S.R., Ridpath J.F. 1995. Assessment of protection from systemic infection or disease afforded by low to intermediate titers of passively acquired neutralizing antibody against bovine viral diarrhea virus in calves. Am. J. Vet. Res. 56:755–759. - PubMed
    1. Booker C.W., Abutarbush S.M., Morley P.S., Guichon P.T., Wildman B.K., Jim G.K., Schunicht O.C., Pittman T.J., Perrett T., Ellis J.A., Appleyard G., Haines D.M. 2008. The effect of bovine viral diarrhea virus infections on health and performance of feedlot cattle. Can. Vet. J. 49:253–260. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burciaga-Robles L.O., Step D.L., Krehbiel C.R., Holland B.P., Richards C.J., Montelongo M.A., Confer A.W., Fulton R.W. 2010. Effects of exposure to calves persistently infected with bovine viral diarrhea virus type 1b and subsequent infection with Manheimia haemolytica on clinical signs and immune variables: Model for bovine respiratory disease via viral and bacterial interaction. J. Anim. Sci. 88:2166–2178. - PubMed
    1. Clark J.H., Olson K.C., Schmidt T.B., Larson R.L., Ellersieck M.R., Alkire D.O., Meyer D.L., Rentfrow G.K., Carr C.C. 2006. Effects of respiratory disease risk and a bolus injection of trace minerals at receiving on growing and finishing performance by beef steers. Prof. Anim. Sci. 22:245–251.
    1. Cole N.A. 1985. Preconditioning steers for the feedlot. Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Prac. 1:401–411. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances