Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Feb;43(2):274-8.
doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs285. Epub 2012 May 30.

Omentoplasty in preventing anastomotic leakage of oesophagogastrostomy following radical oesophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Omentoplasty in preventing anastomotic leakage of oesophagogastrostomy following radical oesophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy

Qing-Feng Zheng et al. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: Anastomotic leakage is a major cause of mortality in oesophageal surgery. Whether omentoplasty after oesophagogastrostomy could reduce anastomotic leakage is still controversial. The aim of this study is to investigate the function of omentoplasty to reinforce cervical oesophagogastrostomy after radical oesophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy.

Methods: A total of 184 patients who underwent radical oesophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy took part in this prospective study. Patients were randomized to receive either the omentoplasty or non-omentoplasty. In the omentoplasty group, the omentum was wrapped around the oesophagogastric anastomosis after oesophagogastrostomy. Age, gender, location of carcinoma, stage, body mass index, diabetes, coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease and performance of omentoplasty were recorded. The anastomotic leakage and stricture and recurrence site were followed up for three years after the operation.

Results: The two groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, location of carcinoma, stage, body mass index, diabetes, coronary artery disease and peripheral vascular disease (P > 0.05). In contrast to the non-omentoplasty group with a postoperative anastomotic leakage rate of 9.8%, the omentoplasty subjects demonstrated a significantly lower rate of 3.3% (P < 0.05). No lethal leakage was found in the omentoplasty group, while two non-omentoplasty patients developed incurable empyema and mediastinitis due to leakage and ultimately died. The rate of incidence of anastomotic stricture in the omentoplasty and non-omentoplasty groups were 4.3% and 2.2% respectively. Of the five cases of death during the hospital stay, two were found in the omentoplasty group and three in non-omentoplasty. There was no significant difference of lethal leakage, stricture and death rate between the two groups (P > 0.05). The hospital stay was significantly longer for non-omentoplasty patients, compared with that for the omentoplasty subjects (P < 0.05). Tumour recurrence in lymphatic- or haematogenous metastasis was similar in both groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Omentoplasty may prevent anastomotic leakage of oesophagogastrostomy following radical oesophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types