Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1990 Sep;40(338):361-4.

National standard setting for quality of care in general practice: attitudes of general practitioners and response to a set of standards

Affiliations

National standard setting for quality of care in general practice: attitudes of general practitioners and response to a set of standards

R Grol. Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Sep.

Abstract

The Nederlands Huisartsen Genootschap (NHG), the college of general practitioners in the Netherlands, has begun a national programme of standard setting for the quality of care in general practice. When the standards have been drawn up and assessed they are disseminated via the journal Huisarts en Wetenschap. In a survey, carried out among a randomized sample of 10% of all general practitioners, attitudes towards national standard setting in general and to the first set of standards (diabetes care) were studied. The response was 70% (453 doctors). A majority of the respondents said they were well informed about the national standard setting initiatives instigated by the NHG (71%) and about the content of the first standards (77%). The general practitioners had a positive attitude towards the setting of national standards for quality of care, and this was particularly true for doctors who were members of the NHG. Although a large majority of doctors said they agreed with most of the guidelines in the diabetes standards fewer respondents were actually working to the guidelines and some of the standards are certain to meet with a lot of resistance. A better knowledge of the standards and a more positive attitude to the process of national standard setting correlated with a more positive attitude to the guidelines formulated in the diabetes standards. The results could serve as a starting point for an exchange of views about standard setting in general practice in other countries.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Eval Health Prof. 1983 Jun;6(2):197-210 - PubMed
    1. QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1986 Mar;12(3):99-108 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 1987 Nov 20;258(19):2708-13 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1989 Jun 3;1(8649):1253-5 - PubMed
    1. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1988;4(1):27-33 - PubMed