Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;9(7):443-9.
doi: 10.1080/15459624.2012.684582.

Quantity and size distribution of cough-generated aerosol particles produced by influenza patients during and after illness

Affiliations

Quantity and size distribution of cough-generated aerosol particles produced by influenza patients during and after illness

William G Lindsley et al. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2012.

Abstract

The question of whether influenza is transmitted to a significant degree by aerosols remains controversial, in part, because little is known about the quantity and size of potentially infectious airborne particles produced by people with influenza. In this study, the size and amount of aerosol particles produced by nine subjects during coughing were measured while they had influenza and after they had recovered, using a laser aerosol particle spectrometer with a size range of 0.35 to 10 μm. Individuals with influenza produce a significantly greater volume of aerosol when ill compared with afterward (p = 0.0143). When the patients had influenza, their average cough aerosol volume was 38.3 picoliters (pL) of particles per cough (SD 43.7); after patients recovered, the average volume was 26.4 pL per cough (SD 45.6). The number of particles produced per cough was also higher when subjects had influenza (average 75,400 particles/cough, SD 97,300) compared with afterward (average 52,200, SD 98,600), although the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.1042). The average number of particles expelled per cough varied widely from patient to patient, ranging from 900 to 302,200 particles/cough while subjects had influenza and 1100 to 308,600 particles/cough after recovery. When the subjects had influenza, an average of 63% of each subject's cough aerosol particle volume in the detection range was in the respirable size fraction (SD 22%), indicating that these particles could reach the alveolar region of the lungs if inhaled by another person. This enhancement in aerosol generation during illness may play an important role in influenza transmission and suggests that a better understanding of this phenomenon is needed to predict the production and dissemination of influenza-laden aerosols by people infected with this virus. [Supplementary materials are available for this article. Go to the publisher's online edition of Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene for the following free supplemental resources: a PDF file of demographic information, influenza test results, and volume and peak flow rate during each cough and a PDF file containing number and size of aerosol particles produced.].

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.. Cough aerosol particle measurement system.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.. Number of particles per cough for different particle sizes for Subject 8. The number of particles detected per cough is shown while the subject had influenza and after recovery. Particle sizes are optical diameters. Each bar shows the average of three coughs. Error bars show the standard deviation.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.. Number of particles per cough during influenza and after recovery. For each subject, the total number of aerosol particles per cough from 0.35 to 10 μm in optical diameter is shown while they had influenza and after they had recovered. Each bar shows the average of three coughs. Error bars show the standard deviation.
FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.. Volume of aerosol particles per liter of air coughed during influenza and after recovery. Total volume of aerosol particles expelled in picoliters per liter of air coughed (pL/l) is shown for each subject with influenza and after they had recovered. Each bar shows the average of three coughs. Error bars show the standard deviation.

References

    1. Weber T.P., and Stilianakis N.I.: Inactivation of influenza A virases in the environment and modes of transmission: A critical review. J. Infect. 57(5): 361–373 (2008). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nicas M., and Jones R.M.: Relative contributions of four exposure pathways to influenza infection risk. Risk Anal. 29(9): 1292–1303 (2009). - PubMed
    1. Belser J.A., Maines T.R., Tumpey T.M., and Katz J.M.: Influenza A virus transmission: Contributing factors and clinical implications. Expert Rev. Mol. Med. 12: e39 (2010). - PubMed
    1. Tellier R.: Aerosol transmission of influenza A virus: A review of new studies. J. R. Soc. Interface 6(Suppl 6): S783—S790 (2009). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brankston G., Gitterman L., Hirji Z., Lemieux C., and Gardam M.: Transmission of influenza A in human beings. Lancet Infect. Dis. 7(4): 257–265 (2007). - PubMed