Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Jun 1;21(124):105-11.
doi: 10.1183/09059180.00005011.

What are the benefits of medical screening and surveillance?

Collaborators, Affiliations
Review

What are the benefits of medical screening and surveillance?

Dennis Wilken et al. Eur Respir Rev. .

Abstract

Pre-employment examination is considered to be an important practice and is commonly performed in several countries within the European Union. The benefits of medical surveillance programmes are not generally accepted and their structure is often inconsistent. The aim of this review was to evaluate, on the basis of the available literature, the usefulness of medical screening and surveillance. MEDLINE was searched from its inception up to March 2010. Retrieved literature was evaluated in a peer-review process and relevant data was collected following a systematic extraction schema. Pre-placement screening identifies subjects who are at an increased risk for developing work-related allergic disease, but pre-employment screening is too low to be used as exclusion criteria. Medical surveillance programmes can identify workers who have, or who are developing, work-related asthma. These programmes can also be used to avoid worsening of symptoms by implementing preventive measures. A combination of different tools within the surveillance programme, adjusted for the risk of the individual worker, improves the predictive value. Medical surveillance programmes provide medical as well as socioeconomic benefits. However, pre-employment screening cannot be used to exclude workers. They may act as a starting point for surveillance strategies. A stratified approach can increase the effectiveness and reduce the costs for such programmes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Statement of Interest

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow chart for medical surveillance to detect work-related asthma (WRA) due to aero-allergens. P(S+): probability of sensitisation assessed by a regular questionnaire; HS: high score, i.e. high probability; IS: intermediate score, i.e. intermediate probability. Adapted from [54] with permission from the publisher.

Comment in

References

    1. Wilson JMG, Junger G. Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. Printed Health Papers No. 34. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1968. Available from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/php/WHO_PHP_34.pdf.
    1. Tarlo SM, Liss GM. Can medical surveillance measures improve the outcome of occupational asthma? J Allergy Clin Immunol 2001; 107: 583–585. - PubMed
    1. Heederik D, van Rooy F. Exposure assessment should be integrated in studies on the prevention and management of occupational asthma. Occup Environ Med 2008; 65: 149–150. - PubMed
    1. Baur X, Sigsgaard T, Aasen TB, et al. . Guidelines for the management of work-related asthma. Eur Respir J 2012; 39: 529–545. - PubMed
    1. The Royal College of General Practitioners. The Development and Implementation of Clinical Guidelines. Report of the Clinical Guidelines Working Group. London, RCGP, 1995.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources