Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 May 28:3:87.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00087. eCollection 2012.

Three ontologies to define phenotype measurement data

Affiliations

Three ontologies to define phenotype measurement data

Mary Shimoyama et al. Front Genet. .

Abstract

Background: There is an increasing need to integrate phenotype measurement data across studies for both human studies and those involving model organisms. Current practices allow researchers to access only those data involved in a single experiment or multiple experiments utilizing the same protocol.

Results: Three ontologies were created: Clinical Measurement Ontology, Measurement Method Ontology and Experimental Condition Ontology. These ontologies provided the framework for integration of rat phenotype data from multiple studies into a single resource as well as facilitated data integration from multiple human epidemiological studies into a centralized repository.

Conclusion: An ontology based framework for phenotype measurement data affords the ability to successfully integrate vital phenotype data into critical resources, regardless of underlying technological structures allowing the user to easily query and retrieve data from multiple studies.

Keywords: ontology; phenotype.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Three ontologies were developed to standardize the three elements of a measurement record: what was measured, how it was measured and under what conditions it was measured.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The Clinical Measurement Ontology is presented in a hierarchical structure with classes lower down a branch being subclasses of those above with an “is_a” relationship.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Each CMO term was created as phenotype domains addressed with appropriate definitions for each term.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The Measurement Method Ontology structure is based on two major branches, “ex vivo” and “in vivo” and the underlying mechanism or technique used in the method.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The Experiment Condition Ontology is structured by type of condition with both “is_a” and “part_of” relationships with links to identifiers found in other ontologies.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The PhenoMiner website.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Example of phenotype measurement data from multiple studies mapped to the three ontologies for clinical measurement, measurement method, and experimental condition.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Amberger J., Bocchini C. A., Scott A. F., Hamosh A. (2009). McKusick’s online Mendelian inheritance in man (OMIM). Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D793–D79610.1093/nar/gkn985 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bouchard C., Leon A. S., Rao D. C., Skinner J. S., Wilmore J. H., Gagnon J. (1995). The HERITAGE family study. Aims, design, and measurement protocol. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 27, 721–729 - PubMed
    1. Butte A. J., Kohane I. S. (2006). Creation and implications of a phenome-genome network. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 55–6210.1038/nbt1150 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Day-Richter J., Harris M. A., Haendel M., Lewis S. (2007). OBO-Edit – an ontology editor for biologists. Bioinformatics 23, 2198–220010.1093/bioinformatics/btm112 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Degtyarenko K., Hastings J., De Matos P., Ennis M. (2009). ChEBI: an open bioinformatics and cheminformatics resource. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics Chapter 14, Unit 14.19.10.1002/0471250953.bi1409s26 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources