Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Jan;83(1):104-9.
doi: 10.2319/013112-88.1. Epub 2012 Jun 1.

Mutagenicity and cytotoxicity in patients submitted to ionizing radiation

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Mutagenicity and cytotoxicity in patients submitted to ionizing radiation

Diego Coelho Lorenzoni et al. Angle Orthod. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate and compare mutagenicity (micronucleus) and cytotoxicity (karyorrhexis, pyknosis, and karyolysis) in exfoliated buccal mucosa cells of children following cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) or conventional radiograph exposure necessary for orthodontic planning.

Materials and methods: A total of 49 healthy children were submitted to CBCT or a conventional orthodontic radiographic protocol; they were divided into two groups based on exam: CBCT (n = 24) and Radiographic Set (n = 25) groups. The micronucleus test in the exfoliated buccal mucosa cells was applied.

Results: There was not a statistically significant difference (P > .05) found between the number of micronucleated buccal mucosa cells (MNC) before and after exposure to radiation in either group, showing that neither group experienced a mutagenic effect. However, radiation did cause other nuclear alterations closely related to cytotoxicity, including karyorrhexis, pyknosis, and karyolysis, in both groups (P < .05). The CBCT group presented a greater increase in cell death than was noted in the Radiographic Set group (P < .044).

Conclusion: According to the micronucleus test, mutagenicity was not induced by the CBCT or the conventional radiographs, but cytotoxicity was verified after these exams, especially after CBCT. That might have happened once the CBCT group received a greater radiation dose than the Radiographic Set group as a result of the protocols used in orthodontic planning for this study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Nuclear alterations evaluation following cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) or radiograph exposure (400× magnification, Feulgen/Fast Green stain): (a) micronucleated (arrow) and normal cells, (b) karyorrhexis (arrow), (c) karyolysis (arrow), and (d) pyknosis (arrow).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bollen AM, Cunha-Cruz J, Hujoel PP. Secular trends in preadult orthodontic care in the United States: 1942–2002. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132:579–585. - PubMed
    1. Minicucci EM, Kowalski LP, Maia MA, et al. Cytogenetic damage in circulating lymphocytes and buccal mucosa cells of head-and-neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. J Radiat Res (Tokyo) 2005;46:135–142. - PubMed
    1. Cerqueira EM, Meireles JR, Lopes MA, et al. Genotoxic effects of X-rays on keratinized mucosa cells during panoramic dental radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008;37:398–403. - PubMed
    1. Miller RC. The micronucleus test as an in vivo cytogenetic method. Environ Health Perspect. 1973;6:167–170. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holland N, Bolognesi C, Kirsch-Volders M, et al. The micronucleus assay in human buccal cells as a tool for biomonitoring DNA damage: the HUMN project perspective on current status and knowledge gaps. Mutat Res. 2008;659:93–108. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources