Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jun;86(6):1032-8.
doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.11-0349.

Leptospira and rodents in Cambodia: environmental determinants of infection

Affiliations

Leptospira and rodents in Cambodia: environmental determinants of infection

Svilena Ivanova et al. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012 Jun.

Abstract

We investigated infection of rodents and shrews by Leptospira spp. in two localities of Cambodia (Veal Renh, Kaev Seima) and in four types of habitat (forests, non-flooded lands, lowland rain-fed paddy fields, houses) during the wet and the dry seasons. Habitat preference was common, and rodent and shrew species were found only in houses or in rain-fed paddy fields or in forests. Among 649 small mammals trapped belonging to 12 rodent species and 1 shrew species, 71 of 642 animals tested were carriers of Leptospira according to the 16S ribosomal RNA marker used. Rodent infection was higher in low-slope locations, corresponding to rain-fed paddy fields, especially in the rainy season and in Kaev Seima. Rodents (Rattus exulans) and shrews (Suncus murinus) inhabiting households showed significantly low levels of infections, whereas rodents living in and near to forests (shrubby wasteland, orchards) showed high levels of infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and slope maps with location of trap lines in the two study sites, Veal Renh and Kaev Seima, Cambodia.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Distribution of rodent species in Cambodia according to habitat types: paddy fields (lowland rain-fed), non-flooded lands, forests, houses on the two first axes of principal component analysis. The factor 1 and 2 accounted for 85% of the variance.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Levett PN. Leptospirosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001;14:296–326. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bharti AR, Nally JE, Ricaldi JN, Matthias MA, Diaz MM, Lovett MA, Levett PN, Gilman RH, Willig MR, Gotuzzo E, Vinetz JM. Leptospirosis: a zoonotic disease of global importance. Lancet Infect Dis. 2003;3:757–771. - PubMed
    1. McBride AJ, Athanazio DA, Reis MG, Ko AI. Leptospirosis. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2005;18:376–386. - PubMed
    1. Adler B, de la Peña Moctezuma A. Leptospira and leptospirosis. Vet Microbiol. 2010;140:287–296. - PubMed
    1. Victoriano AF, Smythe LD, Gloriani-Barzaga N, Cavinta LL, Kasai T, Limpakarnjanarat K, Ong BL, Gongal G, Hall J, Coulombe CA, Yanagihara Y, Yoshida SI, Adler B. Leptospirosis in the Asia Pacific region. BMC Infect Dis. 2009;9:147. - PMC - PubMed

Substances