Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients
- PMID: 22668811
- PMCID: PMC4103614
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182590603
Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients
Abstract
Background: Esophagectomy is a complex operation and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In an attempt to lower morbidity, we have adopted a minimally invasive approach to esophagectomy.
Objectives: Our primary objective was to evaluate the outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) in a large group of patients. Our secondary objective was to compare the modified McKeown minimally invasive approach (videothoracoscopic surgery, laparoscopy, neck anastomosis [MIE-neck]) with our current approach, a modified Ivor Lewis approach (laparoscopy, videothoracoscopic surgery, chest anastomosis [MIE-chest]).
Methods: We reviewed 1033 consecutive patients undergoing MIE. Elective operation was performed on 1011 patients; 22 patients with nonelective operations were excluded. Patients were stratified by surgical approach and perioperative outcomes analyzed. The primary endpoint studied was 30-day mortality.
Results: The MIE-neck was performed in 481 (48%) and MIE-Ivor Lewis in 530 (52%). Patients undergoing MIE-Ivor Lewis were operated in the current era. The median number of lymph nodes resected was 21. The operative mortality was 1.68%. Median length of stay (8 days) and ICU stay (2 days) were similar between the 2 approaches. Mortality rate was 0.9%, and recurrent nerve injury was less frequent in the Ivor Lewis MIE group (P < 0.001).
Conclusions: MIE in our center resulted in acceptable lymph node resection, postoperative outcomes, and low mortality using either an MIE-neck or an MIE-chest approach. The MIE Ivor Lewis approach was associated with reduced recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and mortality of 0.9% and is now our preferred approach. Minimally invasive esophagectomy can be performed safely, with good results in an experienced center.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures




Comment in
-
Poorer Survival for Stage IIa Patients After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.Ann Surg. 2015 Aug;262(2):e45. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000532. Ann Surg. 2015. PMID: 24670854 No abstract available.
-
Reply to Letter: "Poorer Survival for Stage IIa Patients After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy".Ann Surg. 2015 Aug;262(2):e45-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000864. Ann Surg. 2015. PMID: 25590498 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
[Clinical observation on perioperative complications of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy].Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2022 Jun 23;44(6):577-580. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20200704-00626. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2022. PMID: 35754233 Chinese.
-
[Short-term efficacy comparison between Ivor-Lewis approach and McKeown approach in minimally invasive esophagectomy].Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Sep;17(9):888-91. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014. PMID: 25273657 Chinese.
-
McKeown or Ivor Lewis totally minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: systematic review and meta-analysis.J Thorac Dis. 2017 Jul;9(Suppl 8):S826-S833. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.03.173. J Thorac Dis. 2017. PMID: 28815080 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic and thoracoscopic esophagectomy.Adv Surg. 2010;44:101-16. doi: 10.1016/j.yasu.2010.05.002. Adv Surg. 2010. PMID: 20919517 Review.
-
Postoperative complications of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2020 Feb 12;4(2):126-134. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12315. eCollection 2020 Mar. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2020. PMID: 32258977 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Hybrid trans-thoracic esophagectomy with side-to-side stapled intra-thoracic esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer.J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Nov;17(11):1972-9. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2281-7. Epub 2013 Jul 9. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013. PMID: 23835733
-
Techniques and short-term outcomes for total minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophageal resection in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers: pooled data from six European centers.Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):119-126. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4938-2. Epub 2016 Apr 29. Surg Endosc. 2017. PMID: 27129563 Free PMC article.
-
Minimally invasive surgery for gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: Current evidence and future perspectives.World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023 Oct 15;15(10):1675-1690. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i10.1675. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37969407 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Robotic simultaneous resection for colorectal liver metastasis: feasibility for all types of liver resection.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019 Nov;404(7):895-908. doi: 10.1007/s00423-019-01833-7. Epub 2019 Dec 3. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019. PMID: 31797029
-
Propensity-Matched Analysis Comparing Survival After Hybrid Thoracoscopic-Laparotomy Esophagectomy and Complete Thoracoscopic-Laparoscopic Esophagectomy.World J Surg. 2019 Mar;43(3):853-861. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4843-z. World J Surg. 2019. PMID: 30386913
References
-
- Enzinger PC, Mayer RJ. Esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2241–2252. - PubMed
-
- Pennathur A, Luketich JD. Resection for esophageal cancer: strategies for optimal management. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:S751–S756. - PubMed
-
- Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EVA, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1128–1137. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical