Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Jul-Aug;43(7):571-82.

Long-term clinical evaluation of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of human periodontal intraosseous defects: A comparative clinical trial

Affiliations
  • PMID: 22670252
Comparative Study

Long-term clinical evaluation of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of human periodontal intraosseous defects: A comparative clinical trial

Lilian Maria Menezes et al. Quintessence Int. 2012 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the long-term clinical outcomes obtained by the combination of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and a porous hydroxyapatite at the test site with those obtained from the use of a mixture of hydroxyapatite and saline at the control site in the treatment of human intraosseous defects.

Method and materials: Sixty healthy, nonsmoking subjects diagnosed with chronic periodontitis were included in this study. Using a split-mouth design, intraosseous defects were surgically treated with a combination of PRP and a porous hydroxyapatite or a mixture of hydroxyapatite and saline. Clinical measurements and radiographic evaluation were performed at baseline and 1 and 4 years postoperatively.

Results: When compared with baseline, the 1-year results showed no significant changes. However, the 4-year results indicated that while both treatment modalities resulted in significant changes in all clinical parameters (probing depth, relative attachment level, gingival recession, and intraosseous defect fill; P < .001), the test group exhibited statistically significant changes compared with the control group: probing depth reduction, 5.8 ± 0.49 mm vs 4.0 ± 0.45 mm (P < .0001); clinical attachment gain, 5.4 ± 1.2 mm vs 3.1 ± 1.1 mm (P < .0001); and defect fill, 3.2 ± 0.8 mm vs 2.1 ± 0.6 mm (P < .0001).

Conclusion: Treatment with a combination of PRP and hydroxyapatite compared with hydroxyapatite with saline led to a significantly more favorable clinical improvement in intraosseous periodontal defects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources