Current status of validation for robotic surgery simulators - a systematic review
- PMID: 22672340
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11270.x
Current status of validation for robotic surgery simulators - a systematic review
Abstract
To analyse studies validating the effectiveness of robotic surgery simulators. The MEDLINE(®), EMBASE(®) and PsycINFO(®) databases were systematically searched until September 2011. References from retrieved articles were reviewed to broaden the search. The simulator name, training tasks, participant level, training duration and evaluation scoring were extracted from each study. We also extracted data on feasibility, validity, cost-effectiveness, reliability and educational impact. We identified 19 studies investigating simulation options in robotic surgery. There are five different robotic surgery simulation platforms available on the market. In all, 11 studies sought opinion and compared performance between two different groups; 'expert' and 'novice'. Experts ranged in experience from 21-2200 robotic cases. The novice groups consisted of participants with no prior experience on a robotic platform and were often medical students or junior doctors. The Mimic dV-Trainer(®), ProMIS(®), SimSurgery Educational Platform(®) (SEP) and Intuitive systems have shown face, content and construct validity. The Robotic Surgical SimulatorTM system has only been face and content validated. All of the simulators except SEP have shown educational impact. Feasibility and cost-effectiveness of simulation systems was not evaluated in any trial. Virtual reality simulators were shown to be effective training tools for junior trainees. Simulation training holds the greatest potential to be used as an adjunct to traditional training methods to equip the next generation of robotic surgeons with the skills required to operate safely. However, current simulation models have only been validated in small studies. There is no evidence to suggest one type of simulator provides more effective training than any other. More research is needed to validate simulated environments further and investigate the effectiveness of animal and cadaveric training in robotic surgery.
© 2012 BJU International.
Similar articles
-
A Systematic Review of Virtual Reality Simulators for Robot-assisted Surgery.Eur Urol. 2016 Jun;69(6):1065-80. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021. Epub 2015 Oct 1. Eur Urol. 2016. PMID: 26433570
-
Virtual reality simulation training for health professions trainees in gastrointestinal endoscopy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD008237. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008237.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 17;8:CD008237. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008237.pub3. PMID: 22696375 Updated.
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11701100
-
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948. Health Technol Assess. 2024. PMID: 39367772 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340. Health Technol Assess. 2006. PMID: 16959170
Cited by
-
Simulation-based training in robot-assisted surgery: current evidence of value and potential trends for the future.Curr Urol Rep. 2015 Jun;16(6):41. doi: 10.1007/s11934-015-0508-8. Curr Urol Rep. 2015. PMID: 26003110 Review.
-
The effect of different training exercises on the performance outcome on the da Vinci Skills Simulator.Surg Endosc. 2017 Jun;31(6):2397-2405. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5240-z. Epub 2016 Sep 20. Surg Endosc. 2017. PMID: 27651354 Clinical Trial.
-
Could trainees' finger placement at the surgeon's console affect overall outcomes of robotic surgery in radical prostatectomy? A prospective, blinded, robotic simulation pilot study.Can Urol Assoc J. 2024 Sep;18(9):E247-E252. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8709. Can Urol Assoc J. 2024. PMID: 39190174 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic lung cancer surgery: review of experience and costs.J Vis Surg. 2017 Mar 31;3:39. doi: 10.21037/jovs.2017.03.05. eCollection 2017. J Vis Surg. 2017. PMID: 29078602 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Transfer of arthroscopic skills from computer simulation training to the operating theatre: a review of evidence from two randomised controlled studies.SICOT J. 2016 Feb 2;2:4. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2015039. SICOT J. 2016. PMID: 27163093 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources