Interaction of Campylobacter spp. and human probiotics in chicken intestinal mucus
- PMID: 22672405
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2012.01510.x
Interaction of Campylobacter spp. and human probiotics in chicken intestinal mucus
Abstract
Campylobacter is the most common cause of bacterial food-borne diarrhoeal disease throughout the world. The principal risk of human contamination is handling and consumption of contaminated poultry meat. To colonize poultry, Campylobacter adheres to and persists in the mucus layer that covers the intestinal epithelium. Inhibiting adhesion to the mucus could prevent colonization of the intestine. The aim of this study was to investigate in vitro the protective effect of defined commercial human probiotic strains on the adhesion of Campylobacter spp. to chicken intestinal mucus, in a search for alternatives to antibiotics to control this food-borne pathogen. The probiotic strains Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Propionibacterium freudenreichii ssp. shermanii JS and a starter culture strain Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis adhered well to chicken intestinal mucus and were able to reduce the binding of Campylobacter spp. when the mucus was colonized with the probiotic strain before contacting the pathogen. Human-intended probiotics could be useful as prophylactics in poultry feeding for controlling Campylobacter spp. colonization.
© 2012 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.
Similar articles
-
Development of new probiotics by strain combinations: is it possible to improve the adhesion to intestinal mucus?J Dairy Sci. 2007 Jun;90(6):2710-6. doi: 10.3168/jds.2006-456. J Dairy Sci. 2007. PMID: 17517710
-
Protection mechanism of probiotic combination against human pathogens: in vitro adhesion to human intestinal mucus.Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2006;15(4):570-5. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2006. PMID: 17077078 Review.
-
Staphylococcus aureus adheres to human intestinal mucus but can be displaced by certain lactic acid bacteria.Microbiology (Reading). 2006 Jun;152(Pt 6):1819-1826. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.28522-0. Microbiology (Reading). 2006. PMID: 16735744
-
In vitro characteristics of Lactobacillus spp. strains isolated from the chicken digestive tract and their role in the inhibition of Campylobacter colonization.Microbiologyopen. 2017 Oct;6(5):e00512. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.512. Epub 2017 Jul 24. Microbiologyopen. 2017. PMID: 28736979 Free PMC article.
-
Recent Advances in Screening of Anti-Campylobacter Activity in Probiotics for Use in Poultry.Front Microbiol. 2016 May 31;7:553. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00553. eCollection 2016. Front Microbiol. 2016. PMID: 27303366 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of Lactobacillus spp. on adhesion, invasion, and translocation of Campylobacter jejuni in chicken and pig small-intestinal epithelial cell lines.BMC Vet Res. 2020 Feb 3;16(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-2238-5. BMC Vet Res. 2020. PMID: 32013961 Free PMC article.
-
Dairy Propionibacteria: Versatile Probiotics.Microorganisms. 2017 May 13;5(2):24. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms5020024. Microorganisms. 2017. PMID: 28505101 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Avian Intestinal Mucus Modulates Campylobacter jejuni Gene Expression in a Host-Specific Manner.Front Microbiol. 2019 Jan 7;9:3215. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03215. eCollection 2018. Front Microbiol. 2019. PMID: 30687245 Free PMC article.
-
Review of Antibiotic Resistance, Ecology, Dissemination, and Mitigation in U.S. Broiler Poultry Systems.Front Microbiol. 2019 Nov 15;10:2639. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02639. eCollection 2019. Front Microbiol. 2019. PMID: 31803164 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Boosting Broiler Health and Productivity: The Impact of in ovo Probiotics and Early Posthatch Feeding with Bacillus subtilis, Lactobacillus fermentum, and Enterococcus faecium.Microorganisms. 2025 May 27;13(6):1219. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13061219. Microorganisms. 2025. PMID: 40572108 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous